Ask Leo!

Are you being tracked online?

Home » Podcasts » 2007 Podcasts

Advertisers are most likely tracking you, sort of. Should you be concerned?

Listen to the podcast: Are you being tracked online?. It's a podcast!

Transcript

This is Leo Notenboom for askleo.info.

This week there was news of a movement to create a "do not track" registry for the internet, much like the "do not call" registry.

Yep, big brother may not be tracking you, but it's likely that Madison Avenue is.

Most people don't realize how much their online activities are being tracked by retailers and advertisers. Most don't think about it, and those that do typically have a serious and often paranoid misconception about exactly what's happening.

For example a retail store might place your customer number in a cookie on your machine so that the next time you visit the site automatically receives that cookie and knows who you are.

Advertisers can also place so-called "third party" cookies on your machine. Since the same advertiser may be displaying ads on thousands of websites they can track where you go across those sites, even the sites you've never been to before.

So here comes the paranoia: "Oh my God, you mean advertisers are tracking ME?"

Well, yes ... but no.

They're likely not interested in you as a specific individual. There are simply too many people for them to bother tracking anyone specifically. Advertisers are interested in crowds of people, and they collect or "aggregate" the data to see what trends those crowds are following. For example, if half of the people that visit Joe's on-line book store also visit Mary's on-line grocer, that's very interesting data that might be used to tailor specific or more relevant offers to that crowd.

If you're one of the people in that crowd ... well, your identity is likely just lost in the noise.

Amazon.com does this kind of thing within their store all the time. They track what you've purchased and even what you've just looked at, so as to make suggestions of other merchandise that might appeal to you.

Most advertiser tracking is really not much more than the same thing, only with less accuracy, applied to larger groups of people, and across a broader range of sites. Sites may not know who you are, but they may be able to better target what they offer you based on the characteristics of the kinds of crowds you appear via tracking to belong to.

Yes, you can disable cookies, but then a bunch of sites stop working completely. You can disable the third party cookies in most browsers if you like, but there are apparently ways around this that allow the same kinds of information to still be collected.

This isn't to say we shouldn't be watchful, we should. This type of tracking data could be abused. That's one reason I actually do business on-line with a handful of companies that I trust.

But in the long run, with a little bit of common sense, I'm just not that concerned.

I'd love to hear what you think. Visit askleo.info and enter 11964 in the go to article number box to access the show notes, the transcript and to leave me a comment. While you're there, browse the hundreds of technical questions and answers on the site.

Till next time, I'm Leo Notenboom, for askleo.info.

Related:

Article 11964 | Posted November 3, 2007

Recent Comments

While I'm not sure what you mean by 'disabling' cookies, I always go to Tools in Internet Explorer, then under Delete Browing History, I delete everything there that I can, including cookies. To date, I've haven't found doing that kept any sites from working afterward. I've also deleted cookies with AVG Anti-Spyware with no problem afterward with nonworking sites. BombayGranny

Posted by: Bombay Granny at November 4, 2007 09:19 AM

Tracking is simply not an issue for many. I run Firefox with the Adblock Plus and Permit Cookies add-ons. I rarely see online ads and all cookies from most sites are immediately removed when the browser session is closed. Further, my IP address is dynamically assigned by my ISP, changing each time my DSL modem logs in, making tracking difficult by IP address.

What I'd like to know, are there any viable alternatives to push advertising?

Posted by: Ray at November 4, 2007 10:16 AM

Deleting all cookies deletes some that are useful, such as saved logon names so you don't have to enter them every time.

A better way is to use Karen Kenworthy's (www.karenware.com) free Cookie Viewer. Scan the list of cookies and delete any that you don't want. Any cookies that look like tracking cookies add it to the blocked cookies list in Internet Explorer/Tools/Internet Options/Privacy/Sites. So that site can never again put a cookie on your computer.

Posted by: Ken Crook at November 10, 2007 09:29 PM

I no longer allow CCleaner or other programs to clean out cookies. As long as everything is working OK it is just too much bother to start all over every month putting in my information in order to get another cookie. They are more useful than most users realize.

Posted by: terry coon at November 10, 2007 10:08 PM

I am currently not concerned with tracking, however it has been revealed that that government tracks personal phone calls and other private matters in the USA. With the co-operation of the ISPs, this can become a dangerous practice.

Posted by: Tom at November 11, 2007 03:42 AM

Leo, you stated "...but there are apparently ways around this that allow the same kinds of information to still be collected." What are the techniques used? Or what do you think they are using?

Posted by: Chuck Newman at November 13, 2007 07:37 AM

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I've only heard it as a passing reference, but what I heard had to do with
advertiser-specific subdomains off of the parent domain. So something like
ads.somesite.com would still be allowed to place and fetch cookied information
if you allow somesite.com. As I said, my understanding is incomplete here.

Leo


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFHOhzrCMEe9B/8oqERAgnoAJ0TGKYG2wBWVTa5w39VzuqapCZsbQCfXBpR
ejmUsDqXqkSV6m3tqqqlQ5w=
=morJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Posted by: Leo A. Notenboom at November 13, 2007 01:53 PM

If I get a cookie while using Internet Explorer will it track the browsing that I do on my Firefox browser and vice-versa?

Posted by: Aaron Childs at January 30, 2008 12:11 PM

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Nope. The browsers keep separate cookie collections.

Leo


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFHpMeICMEe9B/8oqERAnsCAJ47sEahZCHP2cHqpRzpfgegJ6KKMACcCMgl
T9g6DZ+4m3PAEasbPzuQT/Q=
=TyJt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Posted by: Leo A. Notenboom at February 2, 2008 11:41 AM

Post a comment on "Are you being tracked online?":






(Email Address will not be published.)

Remember Me?

By popular demand...
my tip jar
Cuppa Joe
Buy Leo a Latte!

(you may use HTML tags for style)

New!

RSS feed Subscribe to the RSS Feed specifically for comments on this article.

Before commenting, please...

Please wait. Your comment is being processed ...


Ask Your Question:


ask-leo.com
Web

Stay Informed

Weekly Newsletter

Archives

By Category
By Date

Advertisers

Advertise on Ask Leo!

««   »»

Question? - Ask Leo!
Who is Leo?
Link to Leo!

Terms, Conditions & Privacy