Helping people with computers... one answer at a time.
Hi everyone, this is Leo Notenboom with news, commentary and answers to some of the many questions I get at askleo.info.
Earlier this week the anti-spam company Blue Security ceased its spam fighting efforts in response to on-line attacks by spammers. Blue Security's approach to fighting spam was questionable at best, but the manner of its demise is also very disturbing.
Blue Security's approach was to build a do not spam list that people like you and I would participate in. Sounds like a good idea, right? The "penalty", so to speak, for a spammer sending unsolicited email to the members of the do-not-spam list was a return flood of unsubscribe requests. Now, many call that justified, but I call it vigilante justice. That returned flood of opt-out's is equivalent to a denial of service attack, and that's wrong, no matter who does it or for what reasons.
So while I believe that Blue Security's goal putting the breaks on spam was laudable, in my opinion, their method was not. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Not everyone agrees. In fact, when I got a question last week regarding Blue Security, I replied by saying that their method really concerned me. The person asking the question responded with what I'm sure is a common sentiment: at least they're doing something. People are so frustrated with spam, that doing something, anything, no matter how ill conceived it might be, is seen as a good thing.
As you might expect, violence begat violence, and their denial of service attack on a spammer resulted in retribution in a big way. Blue Security's service was the victim of a denial of service attack, and they were taken off the net. When they moved to a hosted solution, the attack moved with them, and took down not only Blue Security, but SixApart's TypePad blog hosting service as well.
Spammer's don't care who they hurt. In fact, the spammer thought to be responsible is quoted in The Register as saying "if [I] can't send spam, there will be no internet."
Now, while I disagree with Blue Security's approach, the fact that they've folded due to a spammer's actions concerns me. It shows the spammers that the internet equivalent of terrorism can work.
That doesn't bode well for the future of the internet.
I'd love to hear what you think. Visit ask leo dot info, and enter 10299 in the go to article number box. Leave a comment, I read them all.
This is a presentation of askleo.info, a free on-line technical question and answer service. Hundreds of questions and answers are online and ready to help solve your computer problems.
Comments on this entry are closed.
If you have a question, start by using the search box up at the top of the page - there's a very good chance that your question has already been answered on Ask Leo!.
If you don't find your answer, head out to http://askleo.com/ask to ask your question.