Home »
Web
»
Web Site Management
Read the article that everyone's commenting on.
Subscribe to the RSS Feed for comments on this article.
While not cheap, I'd definitely go for DreamWeaver if you can't edit your own code. It's slightly complicated, but produces the best results and, for WYSIWYG editors, is astoundingly feature-full. I haven't used it for a few versions as I got more and more accustomed to writing my own code, but I don't exactly think it would have suddenly started sucking.
Posted by: Queue at May 25, 2009 1:13 PMKompozer is a free WSYWYG and HTML editor and very easy to use. It's not full featured but it produces relatively uncomplicated HTML. To get more cmplicated stuff I edit the HTML and add CSS and Java script.
Posted by: Mark Jacobs at May 25, 2009 1:24 PMOne very good alternative is Visual Site Designer by CoffeeCup.. I used the trial version and it really looks promising.. They have other supporting software like Form and Menu Builders.. Basic price is only $50 but you can get a deal for buying supporting software as well..
Posted by: Marwan Zaki at May 25, 2009 1:34 PMWord was a great HTML generator up through Word 97. I used it for years and got HTML code that was almost as good as I could create by hand.
With Word XP, they added XML support and the Save as HTML option went to crap. For years, I kept a copy of Word 97 installed along with Word XP just for saving a document as HTML.
I finally gave up and started using PDF for everything. (I create documents for my WebCT courses, not websites.) Since switching to PDF, I have not looked back to HTML.
On those rare occasions when I need to generate HTML, I use Wordpad (I know, no checking) unless I need a table. I find those tedious to do by hand so I fire up Frontpage, which I like to do the tables.
Posted by: Ronny at May 25, 2009 2:44 PMI use a simple text editor for my websites, which all use their own database for storing content.
• www.TextPad.com; it has an HTML clip file and a CSS clip file for inserting HTML tags and CSS attributes.
• One CSS file per website;
• One database per website.
Simple! Powerful!
Posted by: jcard21 at May 25, 2009 2:45 PMi prefer notepad ++. it is good for html, php, javascript, and even windows shell scripts (batch files).
and, yes, occasionally a plain text file.
Posted by: Ziggie at May 25, 2009 7:05 PMCall me old fashioned. Notepad.
Posted by: John Hileman at May 26, 2009 5:28 AMKompozer for original page lay-out, boring stuff. Notetab for tweaking, updating and fixing the validation problems.
Posted by: DSU at May 26, 2009 8:25 AMAfter using nothing but Front Page for nearly 10 years, I tried CSS/Joomla and can't see why a lot of people rave about it. It definitely is not WYSIWYG and using tables and images are a nightmare. Give me Front Page and a bit of HTML any day. If you don't believe how good it can be, have a look at my website, www.yachtbroker-charters.com Not bad eh?
Posted by: Bob McKean at May 26, 2009 9:15 AMMany people who consider FrontPage should simply be using WordPress.
Posted by: Ron at May 26, 2009 9:16 AMTo post a comment on "What alternatives are there to FrontPage?", please return to that article's main page.