Read the article that everyone's commenting on.
Subscribe to the RSS Feed for comments on this article.
Leo.. teach me English.. :)

Hi Leo,
I too am amazed at how easily people fall for these scams. They are so obviously not legitmate, especially the example you have here. I have seen some very good attempts at phishing attacks that have fooled staff in my company and I have tried my best to educate peoeple that bascially a big company will not email you for this type of information ever, but people get scared by the threat so easily. All they need to do is contact the company itself to verify if the email is legitimate before they hastily hit reply. i think as a rule if any email has a threatening consequence if you don't do what it says then that should be alarm bells anyway.
Posted by: Lee at September 7, 2009 6:49 PMWhat about those three exclamation points? EH??? :-)
Posted by: eized at September 8, 2009 5:59 AMHow many "phisherman" do you suppose are reading and correcting their "phishing" style using your examples?

"...whomever wrote this didn't really know what they were doing"? Try "whoever". "Whomever" is accusative case (the object of the clause), whereas in this case the usage is nominative case (the subject of the clause) and "whoever" is appropriate. But at least it is not as bad as the common mis-usage where "whoever" (also "who") is used as BOTH subject and object!
You only have to read forums (not this one :-) to see that the general standard of English usage is appalling. So many recipients of this type of spam probably would not appreciate the grammatical points you make in this article. And for many recipients, English would not be their first language, and they might think that the spam is actually good English!
Posted by: Lynn Hancock at September 8, 2009 3:54 PM"whomever wrote this"???
just goes to prove that grammar mistakes are not always proof of a scam

One other reaction I get from my supportees when they get an email or pop-up ad like this is "OMG I have a virus I can't use ma computer anymore until it's cleaned up*
As for Leo's grammar. Cut him some slack. So what if he's got a terminal grammar condition. He's a techie not a grammar geek.
Posted by: Mark at September 8, 2009 5:03 PMIf you just want to dis Leo's use of English, maybe you've just been phished. :-) (Sure, official emails often have occasional mistakes; it happens.) Picky, picky, picky!
Posted by: sirpaul1 at September 8, 2009 11:36 PMthis one comment gave me a good laugh;
How many "phisherman" do you suppose are reading and correcting their "phishing" style using your examples?
Based on history, I'd say ZERO. I'm certainly not the first to have explained it in such detail and it's still coming on strong.
LeoPosted by: Pat Van Dusseldorp at September 8, 2009 10:08 AM
I'd have to agree with Leo here, because most of the scams that are sent out by "phishermen" are usually a cut / copy & paste job, into the new scam email, and just slightly modified to fit the new scam, be it your hotmail, or gmail, yahoo mail, etc. accounts
or the:
"pleas send me your bank account info so I can depost $1m US into;"
scams
Microsoft is not immune to grammatical idiocy either. The one we all see all the time, and that grates on me every time I see it,is on the Control Panel Add/Remove Programs application; i.e., "Please wait while the list is being populated." It's either "Please wait -- the list is being populated" or "Please wait while the list is populated." Also, "populated" is kind of a weird term to apply to something that's not a physical place being occupied by a certain number of animals or something at least organic.
Posted by: Drew at September 11, 2009 4:48 PMTo post a comment on "Is Windows Live Hotmail about to close my account?", please return to that article's main page.