Comments for

Comment from Robin Clay on 2011-09-28

2011-09-28T23:04:17Z

Would it help to re-format the USB stick ?

Absolutely not. Reformatting simply writes to the flash memory even more (often lots more) and would wear it out even further. If flash memory has worn out the only solution is to replace it.

30-Sep-2011

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Mark J on 2011-07-25

2011-07-26T02:49:55Z

@Lancaster
There should be no problem playing mp3 files directly from your flash drive. Writing to the flash memory is what wears it out not so much just reading from it. And playing music only reads the information once for each play,

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from lancaster on 2011-07-25

2011-07-26T01:37:52Z

Is it okay to play mp3 files by directly double clicking on icons on the flash drive. Or should I copy them first to my hard drive and then play them. Is there any disadvantage associated if I play the mp3 files directly from the flash drive.

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from David Zabriskie on 2011-07-19

2011-07-19T20:48:21Z

My experience has been that the device becomes
un writable, but still readable. both for sticks and
cards. I copied the data and sent the media to
the manufacturer for a warranty replacement.

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Lawrence A. Murakami on 2011-06-12

2011-06-12T22:56:37Z

Josh actually killed a 1G Sony Microvault USB Flash Drive in 2008 by writing but it took 90,593,104 (that's 90.5 million) writes for the drive to die. The Flash Drive was unable to be written to any more but could still be read from. I don't know how the life of this Flash Drive compares to others but am sure the technology is improving. I do like flash media and trust flash media but still back up anything impotant. For full details check out Josh's Blog article.

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Mark J on 2011-05-11

2011-05-12T05:23:42Z

@Yeppers.: If you have a file that appears corrupted or a program that won't run, it's possible that one or more bytes have been damaged. To see if you have any bad sectors:
Open "My Computer"
Right click on the drive you want to check and select Properties
click on the Tool Tab
Select Check Now under Error Checking
check the box which says Scan For And Attempt Recovery For Bad Sectors

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Yeppers on 2011-05-11

2011-05-12T03:47:16Z

Leo, in your April 24, 2011 reply to Boris C., your last sentence states that “as soon as one byte goes bad you should immediately assume that all data on the device is tenuous.” That almost sounds like a user, at times, can tell when one or more bytes have become bad on a thumbdrive. If so, and assuming the entire thumbdrive has not yet become inoperable, what are some warning signs that a byte or two have become corrupted? Thanks…

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Boris C. on 2011-04-24

2011-04-24T08:06:10Z

What do you mean by "wrong byte"?

I don't mean any specific byte in all cases, but many file and folder data structures are dependant on some bytes being correct. For example if you corrupt the first byte of any .exe file, that file will no longer work. The same is potentially true of file systems - if the wrong byte in the data structure is corrupted then the entire list of files on your device may be lost. Similarly if there's a partition table and the wrong byte happens to be trashed then the entire partition table could no longer make sense and everything on the drive could be lost. But I'll reiterate that the way that flash drives now "spread the load" across the electronics within the device, as soon as one byte goes bad you should immediately assume that all data on the device is tenuous.

24-Apr-2011

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Boris C. on 2011-04-23

2011-04-23T14:14:16Z

Leo are you saying that one corrupted byte of information can render whole thumbdrive useless? I assume not, because if that was the case then SSDs would not get invented.

If it's the wrong byte, then yes, it's very possible that one corrupted byte can indeed cause the entire contents of a flash drive, SSD, or even a hard drive to disappear. More commonly with flash memory that first corrupted byte is a sign of many more to come very quickly.

23-Apr-2011

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Yeppers on 2011-04-18

2011-04-18T21:02:21Z

Leo, does scanning a USB thumbdrive with an anti-malware software cause the thumbdrive to wear out extra fast? (I recall you saying that writing to memory causes the flash memory to degrade, but reading does not, so I'm guessing the answer is "no" -- but I'm not really sure what an anti-malware scan involves.) Thanks...

It really depends on the anti-malware program, but typically those are read-only operations, and thus shouldn't shorten the life of the flash memory. As always, backup early and often. :-)

19-Apr-2011

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Texas on 2011-02-24

2011-02-24T15:49:09Z

Gonna do some bashing here ... but I have had several USB Flash Drives go bad ... one day ... just nothing happens when I plug it into the computer. And in each case, it has been a Kingston Brand Flash Drive that has failed. All others, no problem for me. Is it just coincidence? maybe, but since I've had 3 Kingston drives fail, its doesn't seem very likely.

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from B Dharma on 2011-01-20

2011-01-20T15:25:49Z

I have a 16Gb usb flash drive that i use everyday.
Its about 2yrs old.
It recently self destructed.
The master file record was corrupted
as well as some other files.
CHKDSK etc did not help.
Reformatting did not help in either NTFS or FAT.
Luckily i make backups.....

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Charles on 2010-11-06

2010-11-07T06:53:34Z

I've used flash drives for about four years now without a hitch. I used to back up to CDs, but flash drives obviously can't be scratched, have much greater capacity for a good price (especially now) and are easier to use and store.

After reading this I became concerned. I use Corsair Voyagers, and found a Corsair PDF that says they can indeed wear out (gasp!) but they use dynamic wear leveling, which gives their flash drives long life. According to them, one would have to write to every block of the drive to constitute an overwrite, and, for a 8 GB drive, overwrite 21 GB of data every day for 10 years to have a chance of wearing out the flash drive. Even if one overwrites 100% once a day to back-up, the life span would be at least 25 years.

It all depends on how you use it. Personally, as Leo suggested, I never have anything on a back-up flash drive that I don't already have on a hard drive, and it would be outrageous for both to fail at the same time. On the other hand, it seems to me the article is a bit alarmist.

My understanging is that the Voyagers are a fairly high quality product - I carry one myself. The problem is that cheap flash drives wear out much more quickly. I don't believe this is alarmist at all, since I hear reports of people losing data because of it fairly regularly. Sounds like you're covered by a good quality drive, and appropriate backup/redundancy practices.

07-Nov-2010

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Joey Baulbaggio on 2010-10-26

2010-10-27T02:08:33Z

i have an old pentium 4 2.26 cpu with 256 ram. the ram runs at 266mgz and the HD is 7200 rpm. will this flash memory speed up my computer? i really don't give a flying frigg if u call it flash memory flash ram hyper boost enema blast or any other numbchuck geeky term. all i wanna know is will it make the dadgummed computer run faster?

It depends entirely on HOW it's used. Just plugging in a flash drive does nothing. "ReadyBoost" supposedly helps speed, but I've heard mixed results. I wouldn't look to flash memory to help speed unless you replaced your hard drive with one of the newer solid state drives, and even then it's not guaranteed.

27-Oct-2010

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Bob on 2010-07-05

2010-07-05T13:55:00Z

My experience with USB memory is this:
I have never thrown away a Flash USB memory stick because it lost data. Ever.
I HAVE thrown away one USB stick because it lost data, but that contained a 'compactflash'-sized 4Gb hard disk drive (I bought it because it was twice the capacity and half the price of flash USB available at that time. I won't buy another like it).
I HAVE thrown away USB memory for other reasons though.
The most common is physical damage. The stick gets sat on, or chewed, or gets mangled in the washing machine. The next most common is storage. As software and technology gets more amd more complex, the amount of storage you need spirals out of control.

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from mike on 2010-06-05

2010-06-05T22:27:22Z

hi , i have a usb flash memory ,that i forgot the password , and i dont want to reset the passowrd coz i have information in it , i broke it by accident ! and i was wondering if thier is one basic part or piece in the usb that is responsible for saving the information? in that way if i could take this part and put it on other usb ???

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Arthur R. Leger on 2010-02-04

2010-02-04T16:59:39Z

To remove a "Fash Drive" from my computer, what do I have to close?

Thank you in advance.
Arthur

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Misinformation, the Product of Wikipedia on 2010-01-14

2010-01-15T00:05:49Z

Wikipedia has a way of getting people to believe stupid things (Like flash drives will suddenly stop working after 3 years). And people have a way of believing everything posted on Wikipedia to be verbatim� and then, by spreading the lie, it comes to the point where no one realizes that it was some Wiki-Dolt who misinterpreted how flash-memory works that made the error in the first place.

First off, those numbers are made up. A press release may use single digit numbers; but for everyone else, tolerances are far more accurate. 100k with a tolerance of 10k would portray a person who "knows what s/he's talking about." The 10k is worse, showing a 90% decrease from the first estimate? Clearly whoever feed you this information did not know what s/he was talking about.

Are you old enough to remember when we said that humans had 100,000 genes? Then we had people saying �okay, we made that information up, there are only 20k genes� and now that same number is climbing again as human superiority must be portrayed in all manners (including the number of genes).

Now people see the words �flash memory� and assume that it has this fixed flaw (or, at the very least, that it cannot exceed 100k). But such an accusation is the same as claiming that Digital Cameras can create compression artifacts and as such Film-Based Cameras also create said artifacts. Flash memory describes a type of memory, but there are many forms of memory under that name.

The worse aspect of this whole mess is how �fixed� this number is. Look at it as buying a new car, you have no guarantee when or if problems will occur, people may throw "averages" at you, but those statistics may only pertain to the factory in Tulsan. And unlike a car, your your FILESYSTEM has the ability to ignore the problems.

That's right, all this jabber about how long your flashdrive will last? Bupkis. You can get write errors, but those are handled by your OS (and those sectors marked as 'bad sectors') but will the data auto-corrupt after 3 years? Hell no. But that's what the Wiki-Dolts want people to think� and that is what they have.

I hold here a 5 year old flash drive, "clean formatted" 8 times (writes 0 in every bit, better than defrag), information copied back and forth like crazy� and it still works.

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Jint on 2009-09-24

2009-09-24T23:33:47Z

They have error protection and will attempt to block out bad blocks and work around the problem.

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Jo Wo on 2009-05-04

2009-05-04T15:01:29Z

I've only had my 8gb kingston thumb drive for a short while and havent used it for much, the occasional word document or so. But as if overnight, I don't know what happened, but now my thumb drive has been reduced to the capacity of 4mb! and also says that it needs to be formatted. I used some partition making program provided by kingston so i don;t know if that screwed up the thing or maybe its somehow this 'wearing out' phenomenon. I've formatted it but it still remains on 4mb capacity! What could have happened?? I don't recall doing any thumb drive no-nos recently...

It sounds like your partition making program made a partition. I'm guessing that you need to re-run it, or another partition program, and reconfigure that drive to be a single 8gig partition.

- Leo
05-May-2009

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Mark on 2009-04-16

2009-04-16T12:51:16Z

I use USB drives pretty regularly with some pen drive apps, especially T-bird and Firefox and a few recovery tools I use to fix peoples computers like Bart-PE, Ubuntu and file recovery stuff. I haven't had any problems but I keep a folder on my hard drive for each USB drive and back up regularly. No hardware is immune to failure. My only loss would be the $10 I invested in my stick.

Here's an old classic:

Yesterday-The Backup Song
Yesterday,
All those backups seemed a waste of pay.
Now my database has gone away.
Oh I believe in yesterday.

Suddenly,
There�s not half the files there used to be,
And there�s a milestone hanging over me
The system crashed so suddenly.

I pushed something wrong
What it was I could not say.
Now all my data�s gone
and I long for yesterday-ay-ay-ay.

Yesterday,
The need for back-ups seemed so far away.
I knew my data was all here to stay,
Now I believe in yesterday

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from David on 2009-04-14

2009-04-14T22:12:16Z

What about thumb drives used in Vistas's "Ready Boost" facility or E-Boostr's program that alleges to do much the same thing in XP?
http://www.eboostr.com/
I tried E-Boostr in XP and I can't say as I noticed a great deal of difference in the perkiness factor, despite using high speed drives! How much reading/writing goes on using these facilities and what sort of life will the drives have? (Tedious, I would imagine!). I did read one report that MS expects a thumb drive using Ready Boost to outlast the PC's life, which seems a tad optimistic to me.

Ready boost actually doesn't constantly write to the flash drive. What it does, as I understand it, is it "pre-loads" some things that you commonly use onto the flash drive for presumably quicker access. It's not a swap file at all.

So, yeah, I actually agree with Microsoft's assessment - since it's not constantly being written to it may well outlive your computer when used for ReadyBoost.

I also have to agree with you. Every report I've heard back is that ReadyBoost doesn't really help that much.

- Leo
15-Apr-2009

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Ken Amirault on 2009-04-14

2009-04-14T18:42:37Z

"Diskeeper Corporation" has a reference in it's settings for Diskeeper 2009 that says it has technology to help flash units from becoming error prone and suggests that longevity can be attained by using their defragmenting technology.

If it "flashes" the drive as you say, defragmenting would reduce longevity, no?

I'm not questioning your guruness, O Mighty Leo, but this seems to be a contradiction. I don't know enough about it, just what I read.

My 2 cents CDN.

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Skeptical on 2009-04-07

2009-04-07T14:20:38Z

I'd rather see some information from the manufacturers on this. Wear-leveling is supposed to be built into the memory controller, so it automatically takes care of wear, and only writes to parts that haven't been written to too many times. One would presume that it would also double-check everything it's written to make sure it can be read correctly, and mark it as a bad sector if it doesn't read back what it wrote.

Yeah, they wear out, but I'm skeptical that you would actually lose any data because of it. In a well-designed product, the available capacity on the drive would just decrease over time.

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Bart on 2009-03-30

2009-03-30T13:32:06Z

the flash can not be read from any computer. They do not recognize a new storage device (the red led on the flash is not on) . is the flash drive gone for good or can it be saved?

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Andre vanMeerbeek on 2009-03-11

2009-03-11T22:09:22Z

Extremely interesting subject. I heard someone say the Eee computer from Asus (and other me-too products) did not have a hard disk, only flash memory. I just browsed through the Asus website, but did not find a confirmation. True, not true?

Not sure on the specific model, but yes, some do have a solid state flash-based disks (SSD). The technology is improving. The flash disks will still wear out, and how quickly will depend on how you use them, but the SSDs likely use a better quality flash memory than your run-of-the-mill USB thumbdrive. I'm staying away from SSDs right now, but I expect that the technology will continue to improve such that an SSD won't wear out until after the expected lifespan of the rest of the computer.

- Leo
12-Mar-2009

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from S. Garrett on 2009-02-21

2009-02-22T04:31:55Z

If these new SSD drives use flash memory, will they also become corrupted quickly from the constant writes?

I keep thinking about jumping to SSD as the prices drop and the sizes jump, and the biggest attraction to me is not the blazing speed (that is nice too), but the peace-of-mind from not having to worry about the old fashioned platter-spinning drives physically crashing.

However, after reading all these comments, it sounds like I'll be lucky if an SSD drive can last a year or two as the main drive on my computer before all the little bits start blowing like fuses.

Do these SSD drives use the same type of flash memory and what kind of life expectancy can I expect. (OZC's latest SSD drive says 1.5 million hours mean time before failure or MTBF, but now I am wondering what that spec measures - is that all time spent reading data and none spent writing).

If the little bits are all being flashed into oblivion will I even get a fraction of that 1.5 million hours? Should I hold off with SSD drives and embrace my good old platter-spinning drives for data integrity and longevity for a while longer?

What I'm hearing is that the flash technology used for SSD drives is improving all the time, and that they may well be viable for many applications. Like you, I'd be nervous, but no longer so nervous that I wouldn't consider trying it. But ... BACKUP! Good advice anyway, but even more so now.

- Leo
22-Feb-2009

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Punk on 2009-02-21

2009-02-21T15:09:37Z

this is just shocking, now i know the reason why my flash drive get many serious problems, when i put the flash drive connected to the computer, i just open my drive and directly run my applications stored in the flash, since the application writes and updates the data in my flash, that's the problem, i had just ran out of write limit of the flash drive, you know, it has so many bad sectors today, i bought last year, yeah, you're right, why don't we just take out a large data storage for more safe and secure data to bring, ready to make a space for a hard drive in my bag, lol, thank you, this is open-minding for a amateur programmer like me

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Joe Krahn on 2009-01-16

2009-01-16T17:25:31Z

J. P. Gilliver is not completely right, as he forgot the point that live database usage can do thousands of writes in one day.

Here is a more important question: Do flash drives manage bad blocks like modern disk drives? If not, they are getting large enough that they probably will start to support SMART testing.

Not quite like hard disks, but as I understand it, more modern flash drives do include something called "wear levelling" that spreads out the usage, and hence the wear, across the entire device, regardless of how it's used. I'm sure this is oversimplified, but each time you write to the device, even if you're re-writing the exact same sector, it's written to a different physical location in the flash memory. It's all transparent, so you never see it, but the effect is that even writing the exact same bit over and over again from the outside will actually get spread throughout the available bits in the device.

- Leo
17-Jan-2009

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Nicholas on 2008-10-20

2008-10-20T22:45:10Z

Comment and questions. Well, everything dies eventually. For flash drives, other factors may present risks, too. I have lost all info few times just because I did not have patience to wait until XP would allow to EJECT/ disconnect USB drive from USB port. That I believe would be the major cause for failure - but drives would work after re-formatting; some recovery software would even let me save some files. I carry my drives with my keys in the pocket of my pants - such a location where they are exposed to mechanical impacts, heat, cold, moisture, electric and magnetic fields from different, at times very powerful sources; you bet this can be damaging, too. [And I've found that data can be lost even from recorded CD-R(W)s or DVD-R(W)s, if the media is not very high quality or not fully compatible; if recording speed or conditions are not good...]
Any technology is imperfect; I try to backup my USB drive onto an external USB or eSATA drive and on recordable/rewritable media, mostly DVD+-R as they are cheap now. And I try to be wise, prepared and "anxious for nothing".
MY QUESTION WOULD BE � what about SD cards, how do they measure up, compared to flash drives? Why they are called �Secure Digital� cards? Are they any better than flash drives etc, reliability wise? What removable media is the best in this sense? And how to know what they sell, how many rewrites that media will sustain? Shouldn�t they inform customers about all that? Thanks and best wishes = Nicholas

SD cards are flash cards. They use flash memory just like any other form factor. Secure I believe means that they support some sort of Digital Rights Management, but I could be mistaken on that.

- Leo
21-Oct-2008

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from blahbleh on 2008-04-12

2008-04-12T07:03:59Z

A quick search reveals that SLC flash has 100000 and MLC flash has 10000.

There is almost NO need to worry about wearing modern flash memory out.

If I format and rewrite the ENTIRE flash disk twice a day, it'll last for more than 13 years with a cheap (read, common) MLC USB flash disk.

In any case, USB flash disks ensure that the wear is even, not concentrated. So it's not 10,000 writes; it's much, much less dramatic.

Use your USB as much as you like; it will be obselete before it is ruined.

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from J. P. Gilliver on 2008-03-06

2008-03-06T20:16:12Z

1. The person who could write to subdirectories but not the root - maybe your root directory is full; try (moving everything out of and then) deleting a directory. There's a finite number of entries allowed in the root in many filing systems.

2. Hard disc bits fail too! It would be interesting to hear some how-many-writes figures for them (and maybe other technologies - ISTR CDRWs aren't very high), to companre with the 10k-100k that seems to be being bandied about for flash.

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Leo A. Notenboom on 2008-03-05

2008-03-05T16:57:15Z

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Everyone uses ReadyBoost as some kind of counter example,
and it's not.

Regardless of the terminology used, ReadyBoost is NOT,
repeat NOT a paging file in the traditional sense. It's much
more like a dynamically tuned pre-load cache, where Windows
can *read* things from quickly as much as it needs to.
Readyboost does NOT *write* to fash ram excessively - it
only updates that pre-load cache on a kind of as-needed
basis.

I've heard of one person actually putting their real Windows
swapfile onto flash memory. It lasted about two days before
the flash drive died. And yes, died as in throw it away
dead.

I stand by my statement: flash memory wears out. It's
getting better, lifespans are increasing, technologies are
being developed to avoid wearing it out any sooner than it
has to, but the bottom line is that writing to flash memory
wears it out. The more you write, the shorter the lifespan,
as simple as that.

Leo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFHztDECMEe9B/8oqERAudWAJ99wwJMEjGNVaSSJTcGdlXjtk/HhwCeJYzB
k6ggrwYXHIzavGMTRgEOU9g=
=l9YV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Tom Garcia on 2008-03-04

2008-03-04T22:56:05Z

Twice I have killed thumb drives when using them to move data from a MAC to a PC. MAC USB devices are not hot-swappable and if you forget to "eject" the device it can not only destroy data but render the device forever unusable. Neither the MAC or the PC now recognizes the existence of the drive(s).

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Graham Sivill on 2008-03-04

2008-03-04T22:20:06Z

Like the previous poster Vista's ready boost system has always worried me from the point of view of wearing out the USB flash drive. I always believed that USB memory sticks had a limited read-write duty cycle and presumably using readyboost means that data is being written to and from the drive at a very high frequency?

We really need to get someone from the flash drive industry to comment on this as increasingly we seem to be heading for solid state disk drives like the optional one in the Mac Air. If these drives are comprised of the same flash memory as USB sticks then presumably they have a limited life span that may be much less than the equivalent hard disk.

Don't get me wrong I want solid state technology as it peeeves me that in the year 2008 we are still using storage that has to spin at 7500 rpm or faster and they are the cause of so much noise, heat and power consumption. Flash drives are better in every respect ... except perhaps one??

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Reg on 2008-03-04

2008-03-04T21:21:37Z

I would think that in normal operation users would be more apt to lose their data in a laundry cycle than write as many times as needed. Backing up these devices is sage advice, but there isn't a need to throw them out (unless it is with the wash!)
Heck, Microsoft even encourages the use of USB Flash memory as extended RAM/pagefile in Vista.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/features/details/readyboost.mspx

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Patrick on 2007-10-25

2007-10-25T22:52:10Z

Yap...it can be quite headache with Thumb drive. I can see my files in the USB drive,but when I try to open or copy them out to another drive, it could not.
I could not even defrag it. any solution?

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Tri Dinh on 2007-05-21

2007-05-21T23:21:23Z

I have a USB thumb drive problem. Just bought a new one 3 weeks ago. I cannot move files to it any longer, the message comes up as "the directory or file cannot be created." I can move the file into a subfolder already on the drive but cannot move it into the drive itself without putting into a subfolder. Also, I cannot rename a subfolder in the drive. I had the same problem on a previous USB drive, bought a new one and all was OK for about 3 weeks, then it happened to the new drive also.
thanks, Tri

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Leo Notenboom on 2007-02-26

2007-02-27T01:00:52Z

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Not that I'm aware of. You could try CHKDSK /R on it, perhaps.

Leo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFF44KyCMEe9B/8oqERAnMoAJ4qwLk+s3Tdj4lUMNTpjmCAydFM8gCeN8hk
TjelzGXS2LfI0L3AeM8e1TM=
=EQch
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from doug on 2007-02-26

2007-02-27T00:54:42Z

Is there any software that will test a thumb drive for remaining life / failing cells / etc?

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from vera on 2006-09-04

2006-09-04T09:49:28Z

my thumbdrive cannot be detected by the usb port. i cannot access my files. all my school projects saved in it are totally inaccessible now. pls help. i need them urgently.

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Cec on 2006-08-18

2006-08-18T22:56:17Z

If you are able to format your USB drive with NTFS (not all systems support this), data on the stick will be "safer". Note I said safer; safer then FAT or FAT32 storage.

Hardware failure cannot be circumvented; however good care of the USB stick will assist in "increasing" it's life span.

Ordinary USB stick drives will "crash" sooner then an average hard drive. A backup copy, or rather copies, on various media is or are essential.

Personally, I backup critical managable data onto 2 different computer drives (on different computers), also to DVD and items small enough also get zipped and emailed to myself.

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Annie on 2006-08-07

2006-08-07T14:16:46Z

Hi,

I am new to the world of portable applications on USBs.So I need a little guidance.I am exploring of developing a portable application on a thumbdrive, which can be connected to a computer and can transfer data to a server database. It would be a standalone application probably developed in java.

Now, I have been going through a lot of articles on the internet. They talk about thumb drive, U3, Ceedo. What would be the best option?can you tell em teh pros and cons of all these options available and what would be the best for my kind of application.

Thanks

Annie

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Leo Notenboom on 2006-08-03

2006-08-04T02:10:51Z

What you're suggesting isn't that difficult. Just minimize writes to the USB drive. I'm not sure what other pointers you might be looking for.

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Annie on 2006-08-03

2006-08-04T01:56:14Z

Hi,

I need some guidance and introduction into using USBs for carrying my application. The application that I am developing would be loaded on a thumb drive without actually having to upload anything on the host computer. With an internet connection, all the data written to the thumb drive should be transferred to a server database.. Any help will be appreciated.

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from James on 2006-05-07

2006-05-08T01:31:02Z

I recently blogged about this and had a good amount of feedback from readers regarding the debatable lifespans of flashdrives with some of them saying that most modern USB drives had algorithms which were intelligent enough to spread out the usage patterns, and also separate bad sectors to minimise the chances of the flashdrive completely dying anytime too soon. Check it out here:

http://friedbeef.blogspot.com/2006/05/can-usb-thumbdrive-wear-out.html

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.

Comment from Robert on 2006-04-17

2006-04-17T20:10:57Z

One other issue with USB thumb drives. The connector on the end is a high stress point. There are reported cases where it breaks internally. When that happens, your data is inaccessible!

]]>

A comment on:

Tech Questions? Get Answers! - Ask Leo! ... by Leo Notenboom
Leo's Answers Newsletter - Ask Leo! in your inbox every week.