<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://ask-leo.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:ask-leo.com,2011://3/tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007-</id>
  <updated>2011-11-22T22:50:39Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Why don&apos;t more websites fit in an 800x600 screen resolution?</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.32-en</generator>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007-comment:28581</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html#c28581" />
    <title>Comment from Leo A. Notenboom on 2007-09-24</title>
    <author>
      <name>Leo A. Notenboom</name>
      <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
      <![CDATA[<p>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br />
Hash: SHA1</p>

<p>It's an IE7 feature.</p>

<p>Leo</p>

<p></p>

<p>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br />
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)</p>

<p>iD8DBQFG+I3eCMEe9B/8oqERArJlAJ0QHjdhsghTpvH+LKGcqBtLsCruSwCeOMtf<br />
nHCkWOgdE+xajoHJkaDyRMc=<br />
=4nFD<br />
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----</p>]]>
      <p>A comment on: <a href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html">Why don&apos;t more websites fit in an 800x600 screen resolution?</a></p>
      <p>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Tech Questions?</a>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Get Answers!</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> ... by Leo Notenboom<br/>
        <a href="http://newsletter.ask-leo.com">Leo's Answers Newsletter</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> in your inbox every week.
      </p>
      <p style="font-size: smaller">All content <a href="http://ask-leo.com/terms.html#copyright">Copyright &copy; 2007</a>.</p>
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-25T04:25:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007-comment:28580</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html#c28580" />
    <title>Comment from Cassandra on 2007-09-23</title>
    <author>
      <name>Cassandra</name>
      <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
      <![CDATA[<p>Please tell me where this IE's Zoom feature is?  What do you have to turn on to make it work?  I have IE6, I'm guessing it's not automatic.</p>]]>
      <p>A comment on: <a href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html">Why don&apos;t more websites fit in an 800x600 screen resolution?</a></p>
      <p>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Tech Questions?</a>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Get Answers!</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> ... by Leo Notenboom<br/>
        <a href="http://newsletter.ask-leo.com">Leo's Answers Newsletter</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> in your inbox every week.
      </p>
      <p style="font-size: smaller">All content <a href="http://ask-leo.com/terms.html#copyright">Copyright &copy; 2007</a>.</p>
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-23T18:55:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007-comment:28579</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html#c28579" />
    <title>Comment from Michael Horowitz on 2007-05-06</title>
    <author>
      <name>Michael Horowitz</name>
      <uri>http://unspecified</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://unspecified">
      <![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, instead of non-wrappable text, it is images on the page that cause the horizontal scrolling at 800x600. </p>

<p>One of my websites, nypc.org has a header image that is 927 pixels wide. However, I use JavaScript to resize this image down to 700 pixels wide so there is no horizontal scrolling at 1024x768. </p>

<p>The script is viewable in the page source, but this is the basic idea: </p>

<p>if (document.body.clientWidth</p>]]>
      <p>A comment on: <a href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html">Why don&apos;t more websites fit in an 800x600 screen resolution?</a></p>
      <p>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Tech Questions?</a>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Get Answers!</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> ... by Leo Notenboom<br/>
        <a href="http://newsletter.ask-leo.com">Leo's Answers Newsletter</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> in your inbox every week.
      </p>
      <p style="font-size: smaller">All content <a href="http://ask-leo.com/terms.html#copyright">Copyright &copy; 2007</a>.</p>
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-06T22:17:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007-comment:28578</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html#c28578" />
    <title>Comment from Leo A. Notenboom on 2007-05-05</title>
    <author>
      <name>Leo A. Notenboom</name>
      <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
      <![CDATA[<p>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br />
Hash: SHA1</p>

<p>Ed: funny you should raise that. I have the task bar on the left on my Windows<br />
Vista laptop for exactly that reason.</p>

<p>But the problem's actually worse than that. Many people don't run the browser<br />
full screen.  So no matter what your screen resolution is, the amount of it<br />
allocated to the browser window is often much less. VERY difficult for web<br />
designers to account for :-).</p>

<p>Leo<br />
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br />
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)</p>

<p>iD8DBQFGPSfiCMEe9B/8oqERAizbAKCGp58d7WJyQDYc5vAInIAlBdIsBQCfXpi5<br />
y/VYxbNSAVRWuKp3SHecR/U=<br />
=RRHT<br />
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----</p>]]>
      <p>A comment on: <a href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html">Why don&apos;t more websites fit in an 800x600 screen resolution?</a></p>
      <p>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Tech Questions?</a>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Get Answers!</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> ... by Leo Notenboom<br/>
        <a href="http://newsletter.ask-leo.com">Leo's Answers Newsletter</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> in your inbox every week.
      </p>
      <p style="font-size: smaller">All content <a href="http://ask-leo.com/terms.html#copyright">Copyright &copy; 2007</a>.</p>
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-06T00:56:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007-comment:28577</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html#c28577" />
    <title>Comment from Leo A. Notenboom on 2007-05-05</title>
    <author>
      <name>Leo A. Notenboom</name>
      <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
      <![CDATA[<p>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br />
Hash: SHA1</p>

<p>Bob: I actually have my own "tinyurl". For example <a href="http://go.ask-leo.com/ms" rel="nofollow">http://ask-leo.com/d-ms</a> goes<br />
to Microsoft.com, but it could be any arbitrary length URL. I use it long URLs<br />
all the time.</p>

<p>I can't control what my visitors post in comments, though.</p>

<p>Leo<br />
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br />
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)</p>

<p>iD8DBQFGPSaNCMEe9B/8oqERAkp4AJ4scqk8MwOX2uo40t3zcuR31T4vxgCgjnEq<br />
hoyjcPMCw+LVYgPD7ZccDKQ=<br />
=8zbO<br />
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----</p>]]>
      <p>A comment on: <a href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html">Why don&apos;t more websites fit in an 800x600 screen resolution?</a></p>
      <p>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Tech Questions?</a>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Get Answers!</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> ... by Leo Notenboom<br/>
        <a href="http://newsletter.ask-leo.com">Leo's Answers Newsletter</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> in your inbox every week.
      </p>
      <p style="font-size: smaller">All content <a href="http://ask-leo.com/terms.html#copyright">Copyright &copy; 2007</a>.</p>
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-06T00:51:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007-comment:28576</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html#c28576" />
    <title>Comment from Ed on 2007-05-05</title>
    <author>
      <name>Ed</name>
      <uri>http://unspecified</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://unspecified">
      <![CDATA[<p>Hi Leo,<br />
Thanks for your educational newsletters.</p>

<p>Now I would not have mentioned it if you had not asked, but I usually get a left-right scroll bar on your pages.  The only way NOT to get one is to set the resolution better than 1024x168.</p>

<p>Why?  Well maybe it has to do with my placing the taskbar vertically up the left side of the screen.  I need more vertical screen than horizontal, so that's where I put the task bar.</p>

<p>Unfortunately an increasing number of webmasters seem never to admit this possibility.  There might also be a technical issue that libraries do not handle it correctly.</p>

<p>With the growth in widescreen PCs , I would expect that vertical placement of the task bar might become more common.</p>

<p>Best regards,<br />
Ed</p>]]>
      <p>A comment on: <a href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html">Why don&apos;t more websites fit in an 800x600 screen resolution?</a></p>
      <p>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Tech Questions?</a>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Get Answers!</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> ... by Leo Notenboom<br/>
        <a href="http://newsletter.ask-leo.com">Leo's Answers Newsletter</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> in your inbox every week.
      </p>
      <p style="font-size: smaller">All content <a href="http://ask-leo.com/terms.html#copyright">Copyright &copy; 2007</a>.</p>
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-05T20:29:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007-comment:28575</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html#c28575" />
    <title>Comment from g. oliver on 2007-05-04</title>
    <author>
      <name>g. oliver</name>
      <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
      <![CDATA[<p>Try Opera. The Opera browser has a "fit to screen" option that allows 640x480 as well as 800x600 without needing a horizontal scrollbar.  Works great.</p>]]>
      <p>A comment on: <a href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html">Why don&apos;t more websites fit in an 800x600 screen resolution?</a></p>
      <p>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Tech Questions?</a>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Get Answers!</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> ... by Leo Notenboom<br/>
        <a href="http://newsletter.ask-leo.com">Leo's Answers Newsletter</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> in your inbox every week.
      </p>
      <p style="font-size: smaller">All content <a href="http://ask-leo.com/terms.html#copyright">Copyright &copy; 2007</a>.</p>
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-05T03:30:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007-comment:28574</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html#c28574" />
    <title>Comment from Bob Seeley on 2007-05-04</title>
    <author>
      <name>Bob Seeley</name>
      <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
      <![CDATA[<p>There's always tinyurl if you don't want that 8% to have to deal with horizontal scrolling.</p>]]>
      <p>A comment on: <a href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html">Why don&apos;t more websites fit in an 800x600 screen resolution?</a></p>
      <p>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Tech Questions?</a>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Get Answers!</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> ... by Leo Notenboom<br/>
        <a href="http://newsletter.ask-leo.com">Leo's Answers Newsletter</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> in your inbox every week.
      </p>
      <p style="font-size: smaller">All content <a href="http://ask-leo.com/terms.html#copyright">Copyright &copy; 2007</a>.</p>
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-05T01:19:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007-comment:28573</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html#c28573" />
    <title>Comment from Leo A. Notenboom on 2007-05-01</title>
    <author>
      <name>Leo A. Notenboom</name>
      <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
      <![CDATA[<p>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br />
Hash: SHA1</p>

<p>Absolutely. Ask Leo! gets roughly a million visitors every month, so you're<br />
very right - that 8% adds up to about 80,000 visitors. That's why, aside from<br />
the issue I mention in the article, I *definitely* haven't written off 800x600<br />
:-).</p>

<p>Someday that percentage will drop even lower, and I'll run across something<br />
where I just can't justify the effort. But for now, 800x600 is on the list.</p>

<p>Leo<br />
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br />
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)</p>

<p>iD8DBQFGN8kwCMEe9B/8oqERAkYJAJ9BbdS34gj3Oz4s95QJM9WO2vzM1gCgiqBP<br />
Csmw7jeJZp9Lt8nG0jeK6Kw=<br />
=iTT3<br />
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----</p>]]>
      <p>A comment on: <a href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html">Why don&apos;t more websites fit in an 800x600 screen resolution?</a></p>
      <p>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Tech Questions?</a>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Get Answers!</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> ... by Leo Notenboom<br/>
        <a href="http://newsletter.ask-leo.com">Leo's Answers Newsletter</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> in your inbox every week.
      </p>
      <p style="font-size: smaller">All content <a href="http://ask-leo.com/terms.html#copyright">Copyright &copy; 2007</a>.</p>
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-01T23:11:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007-comment:28572</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:ask-leo.com,2007://3.3007" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html#c28572" />
    <title>Comment from Catmoves on 2007-05-01</title>
    <author>
      <name>Catmoves</name>
      <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
      <![CDATA[<p>Of course we all have opinions. I believe Fred Langa discussed this one of his old post on <br />
The Langa Letter. I seem to remember he had solution, too. <br />
BTW, 8% may not seem like very many, but if the proper math is applied I would be sure the numbers would work out to several thousand. After all, some people will put up with any discomfort.</p>]]>
      <p>A comment on: <a href="http://ask-leo.com/why_dont_more_websites_fit_in_an_800x600_screen_resolution.html">Why don&apos;t more websites fit in an 800x600 screen resolution?</a></p>
      <p>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Tech Questions?</a>
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Get Answers!</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> ... by Leo Notenboom<br/>
        <a href="http://newsletter.ask-leo.com">Leo's Answers Newsletter</a> -
        <a href="http://ask-leo.com">Ask Leo!</a> in your inbox every week.
      </p>
      <p style="font-size: smaller">All content <a href="http://ask-leo.com/terms.html#copyright">Copyright &copy; 2007</a>.</p>
    </content>
    <published>2007-05-01T22:50:22Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>

