Helping people with computers... one answer at a time.
Blocking spam based on the email address it comes from is pretty pointless. I'll look at why and what you should do instead.
I get hundreds of junk emails per day, and after checking them, I click on "clear junk mail folder" to get rid of them. Does that action also block the address from future junk emails, or must I block each one individually?
•
First, it depends on what email program you're using. Since you didn't say, I can't say for absolute certain.
However...
Emptying your junk mail folder simply empties a folder and does nothing else.
My real concern is the second part of your statement where you wonder if you need to block them individually.
Yes, but in my opinion it'd be a colossal waste of time.
•
No. Not really. At least, not usually.
The fact is the "From:" address on spam is now an exceptionally unreliable way to identify most spam. Spammers will commonly use fake "From:" addresses, and assign them randomly. This makes it look like the message came from someone who had nothing to do with it.
It also means that the "From:" address on spam keeps changing. You may often get the exact same spam "From:" several different email addresses, even though it was all sent by the same spammer.
The result is that blocking most spam based on the "From:" address is pretty pointless. The chances that you would get spam from them again are already very low, as the address keeps changing. And, since the address keeps changing, you'll probably keep getting that same spam again, "From:" other people.
Obviously, if you're seeing a series of spam that all come from the same email address, then by all means block it if you want. However, it probably won't address the majority of what you're seeing.
You can still block all you want, I'm just saying it won't help. It'll take up a lot of time, without any real positive effect.
This is where spam blocking tools help you.
If spam lands in your junk folder, you're done. That's pretty much the best possible result. Typically there's no reasonable way to prevent the email from arriving, but at least you can have it automatically sent into the spam folder where you need not look at it unless you choose to.
If spam lands in your inbox, then use the "this is spam" button, or its equivalent if you have one, to mark the email as spam. This does several different things, including moving the spam to the spam folder. More importantly, though, it uses that email - all of that email including the message itself - to better "learn" what is and is not spam.
The more often you mark spam as spam, the better the system gets at identifying spam.
Be careful: if you mark things as spam that are not actually spam, you'll increase the possibilities that legitimate email will be falsely marked as spam.
The rule's simple: if it's truly spam (email you didn't ask for), and it's in your inbox, mark it as spam. If you did ask for it (i.e. it's a newsletter you signed up for, or a company you said "sure, send me information", then it's not spam. Unsubscribe to stop receiving it.
In the long run, your correctly identifying spam that has erroneously landed in your inbox is the best way to help the system improve its spam detection.
It'll never be perfect, we need to be clear on that, but getting mail properly filtered to your spam folder is a step.
Article C4444 - September 9, 2010
I use Incredimail for my email. It has Advanced Account Access which means I take it directly off the server so I choose what goes into my computer.
Posted by: Eileen at September 14, 2010 2:41 PMStrangely the best spam stopper I've discovered is an email address with a name and number! For no good reason, I always avoided numbers in my email but I wound up having to use one on one account and that address gets almost zero spam while my other two get quite a bit. Can't explain it, but if I had it to do all over again...
Posted by: Marty Wolfson at September 14, 2010 3:08 PMSo far I have found only one way to get less or at times no spam: A good e-mail provider! And yes, Gmail is among the best! I have one company provider that is even better, and one paid provider that passed up to 100 spams per day - until I started passing it through gmail first.
Posted by: Linde at September 15, 2010 2:08 PMYou can also use SMTP protocol messages to simulate a server bounce, which might reduce future attempts to send spam to that address.
Posted by: Mikey at September 16, 2010 1:46 PMRegarding the unsubscribe comment above: some companies have multiple email subscriptions and you have to unsubscribe from all of them. I ran into this when my husband passed away and I needed to keep his email account active. I kept getting emails from one company but I noticed that each was from a slightly different email address... such as newsletter, updates, new products, etc.
Posted by: Kathy at September 28, 2010 12:17 PM