|
Home »
General Computing
»
Maintenance and Backup
Summary: Backing up a large number of machines over a network has a number of challenges. PST files are only one aspect of the issue.
In the ideal world, we'd change user behavior to clean up their PSTs to make them more manageable, and we'd implement one or more of the backup alternatives you mentioned. However we're dealing with the real world here, and need a real world solution. One thing that concerns me is that there's typically a lot more to life than a PST. How are you backing up everything else? • To just answer the specific question you've asked, here's the 'real world' path I'd head down:
Like I said, I think nightly backups are important, and I think preserving those backups to tape is also important. Once on tape you can decide how long you want to keep your backups: a week, a month, a year, or longer. That becomes a policy decision, not a technical one. • With that out of the way, I want to address what I fear is a bigger issue. Great, you've backed up their PSTs. What about everything else on their machines? Perhaps they have work documents that aren't part of email that would represent a catastrophic loss if a hard disk crashed. In other words, backing up email is not enough. I believe you need to look at the much bigger picture of how data of all sorts is managed in your environment and how it's being backed up. Or not. Pick a random user's machine and ask: if this machine and all the data on it disappeared, how much of a problem would that be? I'm guessing there's more than email that your users would care about. "... backing up email is not enough."
The problem here is that there's no single magic answer in an environment such as you describe. For the single machine home user an external hard drive and a good backup program are enough. For your situation you probably want something more comprehensive for your 200+ users. One thing you can count on, though: even with the best of intentions you cannot rely on all 200 of those users to backup themselves. In an ideal world, maybe, but here in the real world? It's just not gonna happen. Ideas:
Of course you could give everyone an external hard drive and a backup program and set them up to backup each machine individually. For a set of machines that large and with that many users, the issue here is that there's no auditability, and each user needs to at least be able to notice if the backup's not working. • I can't resist talking just a little about the ideal world as well. Perhaps some of it'll rub off and generate some ideas that might make sense in your situation. Ideally we'd educate all users in the importance of keeping their PST's lean and mean. Perhaps we'd have them create "archive" PSTs which could be kept out on your network somewhere while keeping their active PSTs small, fast, and more importantly easier to back up. You might mention potential data loss to your users since older versions of Outlook's file format break when the file exceeds 2 gigabytes in size. It's also not enough to be running a newer version of Outlook; it's the file format in use that matters and Outlook does not automatically upgrade the file format. And no amount of backing up - by your users or by you - will recover the data lost due to exceeding that file size. Related:
Article 11469 | Posted May 9, 2007 |
Popular & Hot How do I make a new MSN Hotmail account? How do I delete history items from my Google tool bar? My desktop Recycle Bin has disappeared - why, and how do I get it back? How do I delete my Hotmail account? I accidentally deleted my Recycle Bin in Vista - how do I get it back? New & Important How can I get the old Windows Live Hotmail back? Internet Safety: How do I keep my computer safe on the internet? Are free email services worth it? Would you please recover my password? My account has been hacked or I've forgotten it.
Stay Informed Archives Advertisers |
|
•
You hit the nail on the head, even with the very small amount of info I gave you, very impressive!
Posted by: Jon Beaudet at May 9, 2007 11:35 AMThe larger picture of entire backups is the main issue here.
Most users do store all their data on the network, not their local c:drive.
So really, their local machine only holds their pst file and maybe some internet favorites.
I do like the "network acces" for backups you speak of.
Would running a batch file on logoff/shutdown via Active Directory be a good or bad idea?
Basically copying their pst to a file server, and then tape backup of that.
mr. leo
Posted by: dhananjay at March 28, 2008 7:28 AMi am using microsoft outlook 2007. i have a huge 6 gb + .pst file. all mails are important to me. my bussiness is running on these mails. i can't afforde to delete them. my problem is i cann't copy my .pst file to another disk or burn one dvd. when i try to copy a message appears saying " file size is too big". there fore i cann't format my system. it is working very slow.
can u give me any solution. waiting for your early and constructive reply.
thanking you
dhananjay
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Break the PST up into smaller ones on your machine first,
and then backup the smaller ones.
For example, I create a PST for each year as my archive.
Works great and copies easily.
Leo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFH7vBxCMEe9B/8oqERAsdaAJ96d7rW/thGPhCaDoNbAETz+QV0DwCeMBac
Posted by: Leo A. Notenboom at March 29, 2008 6:44 PMm/WwHbnk7NA+8kvrYaRNFys=
=P7HR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----