Helping people with computers... one answer at a time.
While image backups are optimized for restoring back to the original hardware, they remain critically useful in other scenarios as well.
Regarding the option of using a complete disk image backup versus a files backup only: I carefully read your recommendations and understand the difference between the two and the advantage of having a full image backup for the case that the computer might fail to start or the hard disk might become unusable. But, along with this, from some more reading, I understand that a full image backup (including the operating system) can only be helpful if you have to restore to a machine having an identical or almost identical hardware. Otherwise, a full image restore probably will not work. What about the case that you have to completely replace your machine with another one having (most probably) different hardware? If you only have a full image backup of the previous machine, is it still possible to use this backup for restoring the entire system? Or will it be much better to have a file backup of all of your software programs installation *.exe files (setup) plus all your data, and, even at the expense of having to reinstall the entire software, to be able to rescue the entire contents instead of NOT being able to restore at all?
•
There's a lot of confusion around what you can and cannot do with an image backup.
As you say, because it's a complete snapshot of your machine, an image backup can be used to completely restore everything that was on that machine at the time that the backup was taken.
But what if the machine changes?
Things may get slightly more complicated, but that image backup is still critically valuable.
•
When it comes to backups, the term "image" can mean either of two things:
Every byte of every file that is on the hard disk, including the boot sector, the operating system, all of your installed programs, and of course, all of your data. In this sense, it is an "image" of all of the data on that hard drive.
Every byte of every sector on the hard drive, whether it's currently in use or not. Coincidentally, this also contains all of the data on the drive as well as whatever was in all of the unused sectors.

For purposes of our discussions here, the difference doesn't matter. You may hear them referred to as images, clones, or copies, but as long as every bit of data is there, regardless of what it is, I'll simply refer to it as an "image backup."
When you take an image backup of your C: drive, you're backing up all of Windows in addition to your data.
That means the backup contains Windows as well as all of the machine-specific drivers and settings for that particular machine.
The net result is that an image backup of your system drive is optimized so that you can simply restore it back in its entirety and it's ready to go.
When the hardware changes, things get ... interesting.
Let's assume that the hardware has changed dramatically. Completely different computer from a completely different manufacturer with different ... everything.
If you've used the correct backup software to create your image, you'll still want it.
Here's how:
You'll install Windows on your replacement machine from scratch. This will allow Windows to configure itself for the new hardware. (Perhaps a copy of Windows will even be pre-installed.)
You'll reinstall the applications that you use. Perhaps some might be pre-installed, depending on where the machine came from, but the worst case is that you'll need to install or reinstall any that you need from scratch from original installation media.
You'll restore your data from the image backup.
An optional approach to that last step is to install a second hard drive, or use an external hard drive, and restore the image backup to that. That way, once running, you can simply access all of the files that it contained.
The reason that image backups are so powerful is that they contain everything; you don't even have to think about what to backup. You may not need the entire backup when restoring to a new machine, but you'll still want it for your data files.
Because everything that was on the drive is there in the backup.
Everything.
Occasionally, an image backup can be used very close to its optimal way: restore the complete computer directly from the image.
One scenario is:
Restore the hard disk from the image backup.
Reboot into the restored copy of Windows.
Windows notices that "a few" things have changed and adjusts itself accordingly.
That's perhaps the best-case scenario for new hardware. It might be followed by some partition management if the hard disk that's being restored to is a different size than the original, expanding the restored image to take up all available space.
Another scenario that I've heard of that works occasionally:
Restore the hard disk from the image backup.
Boot from your Windows installation media.
Perform a "repair" install of Windows.
Reboot into the restored and fixed copy of Windows.
Naturally, that assumes that you have your installation media available.
And finally, a third scenario is emerging:
Restore the hard disk from the image backup.
The backup software that you're using specifically supports restoring to different hardware and as it performs the restore, or perhaps after, it attempts to make the necessary adjustments.
Assuming that's successful, reboot into the restored and fixed copy of Windows.
I don't have any direct experience with this scenario and remain somewhat skeptical that all possible hardware configurations could be handled, but the goal is laudable and promising.
As I mentioned above, because an image backup contains everything on your hard drive, it's nearly the perfect safety net. Even if you can't use it for a complete restore of that image by definition, it contains every file on that hard drive. Without needing to remember what to backup, you have everything and can recover your data no matter what.
Article C5091 - February 29, 2012 « »
March 3, 2012 4:27 PM
I think I refered this question before but ..
Since I change things around [ like socks and underwaer] I've used Karens power tools [ replicator]
which is free. I copy the boot drive files [1] registry[2].
When the drive failed and I replaced it with a bigger alien drive; I reloaded XP from original disks, copied back the whole saved boot files [ overwriting any existing files], copied the old registry - reboot, presto!
March 23, 2012 12:54 PM
I agree with John McCurdy - that is an excellent way of moving data to a new computer. I use Macrium Reflect, myself, and highly recommend it.
March 23, 2012 6:14 PM
I strongly agree image backups are very powerful and are one of the best if not the best way of backing up your entire system.
I currently manage a dozen or so small businesses who which have either a peer to peer or client server network and I am deploying Acronis Backup and Restore 2011 Advanced edition and I understand there is a version that will install an image backup to indifferent hardware.
So even if you need to change hardware (purchase new system without OS or change hard drives) you can restore this image to different hardware. Yet to test this out in my labs.
August 1, 2012 8:19 PM
My question is the same as Peggy's (which hasn't been answered). I have a Dell desktop and it has a small hidden partition which is FAT16 and Windows won't image it nor let me deselect it. It is marked Active. Can I make the C drive active and just delete this hidden partition or convert it to NTFS?
December 21, 2012 9:31 AM
Most "Acronis" True Image Programs will restore a BackUp Image to completely Different Hardware also "Paragon" Backup Programs also offer restore to different hardware option.
I.ve been using True Image products for 10 and Recommend them, but "Paragon" products I've also had Good experiences with.