Helping people with computers... one answer at a time.

SP2 or SP3 for Windows XP? SP1 or SP2 for Vista? For now, at least, which one do you need, and will that last? I'll look at the confusing combinations.

I'm running Windows XP Pro, Service Pack 2. When Service Pack 3 came out several months ago, I dutifully installed it and several of my apps quit working or didn't work properly. So, in my usual "I hate MS" fit of anger, I restored to a good SP2 version and checked "Don't bother me about this update again" on the Windows Auto Update site.

I still get a nagging reminder occasionally, but I choose not to install. My concern is whether or not I'm spiting myself by leaving myself vulnerable without SP3. Assuming I have a decent firewall, AV software, and security checker software, and I run Malicious Software Removal tool every Wednesday morning, I'd like your thoughts on this matter.

I agree that the whole service pack situation can be both frustrating and confusing. In an ideal world we'd just use "always update to the latest" as the rule of thumb, and all would or should be well. Sadly, it's not an ideal world.

Unfortunately, software vendors, including both Microsoft and third party vendors, often need to set a minimum required installation as something that their additional software can rely on.

Let's look at the bare minimum, and what you should be at least attempting to do.

And some thoughts on how it might be before the rules will, of necessity, change.

Windows XP

SP2: install it.

That much is easy. It's been out for years, many other software packages expect it, and Microsoft doesn't formally support XP without it.

"'Most' people install SP3 without a problem but if you're not most people that's not much consolation."

SP3: so far it's my understanding that SP3 is not actually required. If you just have SP2 you'll still get all the necessary security updates. That being said, I don't expect that situation to last forever, and someday SP3 (or perhaps a successor) will end up being required.

I know that, like you, some folks have had difficulty with SP3 and there's no blanket answer as to what to do about it, as the problems seem to stem from different causes. "Most" people install SP3 without a problem but if you're not most people that's not much consolation. See my tips for ensuring the smoothest possible install, below.

Windows Vista

SP1: Neither SP1 or SP2 are "required" at this point, with one notable exception which I'll get to in a moment. My position on SP1 right now is that it's very likely to be safe to install. It was finally offered to my Vista laptop several months ago, and the installation went off without a hitch.

In a very odd break from tradition, SP1 is apparently required before you can install SP2. In the past service packs were "cumulative" from the original release of the operating system they were patching and did not rely on any prior service pack having been installed.

SP2: is, as of this writing, a relatively recent release. It's not required, and isn't even being offered to all systems yet via automatic updates.

Since SP1 and SP2 are not required, my assumption (admittedly a dangerous path) is that security issues, especially those deemed "critical" by Microsoft, will be available for your system regardless.

Skipping Service Packs

When you elect to skip a service pack that's not required you're generally missing non-critical fixes and new features only.

That being said, in my opinion it's only a matter of time. By that I mean that eventually you will want, or need, to install the service pack that you skipped. Either its installation will become a pre-requisite for continued updates, or you'll find yourself in need of a fix or feature only included in the service pack in order to use some aspect of your machine or third party software.

Installing Service Packs Safely

As we've seen, service packs can, in fact, occasionally cause more trouble than they fix. As I said earlier, even if "Most" people install a service pack without problem, if you're not most people that's not a lot of consolation.

Here's what I recommend:

  • Wait a while after a service pack is released. If that means telling Automatic Updates to not install or stop nagging you, so be it. Pay attention to "the buzz" from mainstream technical press - don't be too alarmed if you see some catastrophes - that can happen with the best of service packs for a variety of reasons. But do pay attention to the number and severity of problems, and how they might relate to your computer and its software or hardware.

  • Back up. As I said, even with the best of service packs a change this large is bound to cause someone problems. If that's you, you'll want to be prepared, and that means having a full image backup taken immediately prior to the service pack installation. If all goes well, you'll never need it. If all hell breaks loose, you can revert completely - as if it never happened.

  • Tread lightly for a while. Even after a successful install, it's worth not planning any large scale changes or additional installations until you're sure that things are working as expected.

So, what if the worst happens, and your Service Pack install resulted in a disaster? You've reverted to your backup, but now what?

Service pack installs fail primarily for two reasons: problems with specific hardware, and problems with - for lack of a better term - messy systems. I don't mean your mess (documents and the like), I mean operating system mess from prior and perhaps incomplete software installations, leftovers and what I lovingly refer to as "software rot".

Start by doing a little research to see if others with machines or other hardware similar to yours are having problems. Manufacturer's support forums are a great resource for this.

Finally, consider a clean install. That's the "reformat and reinstall everything from scratch" approach. It ensures that your system is in it's cleanest possible state prior to installing the service pack.

Article C3828 - August 5, 2009

Leo Leo A. Notenboom has been playing with computers since he was required to take a programming class in 1976. An 18 year career as a programmer at Microsoft soon followed. After "retiring" in 2001, Leo started Ask Leo! in 2003 as a place for answers to common computer and technical questions. More about Leo.

Not what you needed?

Recent Comments
17 Comments

"You also cannot update from XP (sans Service Pack) straight to SP3. You must install SP2 first."

Not true. After doing a format and reinstall of Windows XP/with SP1, I installed SP3 from the CD and everything went fine. I bought the CD from Microsoft for around $7. It saved me a lot of time downloading updates. It probably is a good idea to do a reinstall every couple of years. My computer ran a lot better after the clean install.

It would be nice if Microsoft released a new CD of service packs every year to make reinstalling easier.

Posted by: Kenneth Crook at August 15, 2009 11:21 PM

I'm still a little confused with service packs.
I just recently installed vista home premium and then went to windows update. It didn't say anything about vista service pack 1 when it checked for available updates. It just said basically that I required many updates. After I download the numerous updates it said that windows is up to date. I am just wondering if I still need service pack 1 or is my computer up to date? When I check system information under vista version it doesn't say anything about service pack 1 being installed on my computer. Basically what I'm asking is, are all those individual updates I downloaded, included in service pack 1 for vista, which means I do have service pack 1 anyway?

Essentially: don't worry about it and let Windows Update inform you of what you need. It's likely that your Vista was one with SP1 pre-installed (most are now).
Leo
03-Nov-2009

Posted by: monazz at November 2, 2009 7:11 PM

i have sp2 and sp3 on my xp pro laptop do i need them both as they are using a lot of memory ,,, thanks

Posted by: anne daley at December 18, 2009 8:29 AM

do i really need service pack 3? are there any advantages or disadvantages over service pack 2?

Posted by: jerry at January 15, 2010 4:55 AM

I recently did a pretty intensive update on my home PC, running Vista 64 Home Premium. It was pre-installed with SP1, but I noticed SP2 was amongst the updates, so I ticked everything.
At the end of the long update process, and a few reboots later, I noticed the automatic update reminding me about new updates - it hadn't installed SP2. I did some checking, and found a 'hot-fix' for people having problems with SP2, so I downloaded and tried to install that.
It failed to install, and so does SP2.

Any ideas?

Posted by: Bob at June 21, 2010 1:10 AM
Post a comment on "Just what service packs do I need?":





Remember Me?

(You may use HTML tags for style)

Before commenting, please...

  • READ THE ARTICLE. A comment that shows you didn't will be deleted and ignored.

  • Comment only on the article. Use the search box at the top of the page if you have a question about something else.

  • NO PERSONAL INFORMATION in the comment. No email addresses. No phone numbers. No physical addresses.

  • Anything that looks the least bit like spam will be deleted. Links to unrelated sites or links that appear to be primarily promotional will be deleted, or the comment will be deleted.

  • Don't ask me to recover lost passwords or hacked accounts. I can't. Those comments will be deleted.

  • I can't respond to every comment. And I can't vouch for the accuracy of others who do.

Please wait. Your comment is being processed ...