|
Summary: Linux is often a viable alternative to extend the life of older machines. We'll look at some of the issues involved in switching to Linux.
Linux is a great way to extend the life of older computers, simply because the resource requirements of many Linux distributions are so much less than that of Windows. There are naturally a few "gotcha's" along the way. But before we even go there, we need to make sure that we're solving the right problem. • Many people often fail to realize that for web surfing it's often not their computer that's the choke point but rather the internet connection itself. Depending on what you do online speeding up your existing computer, or even getting a new one, won't necessarily improve your internet experience or improve it much. So before embarking on anything major like an operating system switch, I'd make sure that it's the machine that's at fault to begin with. It may well be, but it's best to make sure. Since you have other machines in the home, some presumably newer, you can do a side-by-side comparison. One other thing I'll recommend before the switch is to clean up the old machine. Normally I'd say things like clear your browser cache, defragment the hard disk, consider running a utility like SpinRite, and so on, all of which can improve performance depending on the state of the machine without destroying any data. But if you're willing to install another OS, erasing everything isn't apparently an issue for you. Hence, what I would do first is reinstall Windows from scratch, having it reformat the entire hard disk as it does so. I'd deselect options you don't need as you install, and then revisit what's running automatically after it's done. A lot of "stuff" accumulates over time as a machine is used, and much of it can affect performance. A reformat and reinstall clears it all away. "The real answer of whether Linux will do for you at all
really depends on exactly how you will use your computer."
With that, you might once again have a nicely workable system without having to switch. • If all that didn't help, then let's move on to Linux. First, a word about distributions: there are a ton of them. I tend to gravitate towards Ubuntu for its large installed base, relative ease of installation, and a fair amount of available support. Because not all packages are available for all distributions, I'm assuming Ubuntu as I discuss Linux below. The real answer of whether Linux will do for you at all really depends on exactly how you will use your computer. If it's just web surfing and email, then I think you'll be very happy. Packages like Thunderbird or Firefox are cross-platform and work equally well on Windows and Linux. If you need to do word processing, spreadsheets and the like, OpenOffice is available, and it can exchange files with its Windows counterparts and Microsoft Office. Note, however, that it "feels" different, and you'll find yourself relearning how do to things and find features the Open Office way as opposed to the Microsoft Office way. Again, depending on your own style and needs that could be a problem, or not at all. If you're a gamer, the news isn't so good. Granted, you have an underpowered machine for current games as it is, but even many of the games that worked on your machine running Windows will not work in Linux. Current thinking is that anti-virus and anti-spyware isn't as critical on Linux, and as a result while there are packages out there for both, they're typically not as mature as their Windows counterparts, and to be honest most people don't bother. Most spyware and viruses are Windows-specific. I've personally looked into moving to Linux or a Mac. In both cases I'm thwarted by some of the applications that I need for my daily work that simply aren't available on either platform in a cross-platform way. That includes things like Microsoft Money (or Quicken, for many people), Truecrypt, roboform, and my video editing software. In some cases there are quite viable alternatives but in my case I need to be able to switch back and forth, hence I need alternatives that are cross-platform compatible like Thunderbird or Open Office. So your usage plays a role here too. If you, for example, regularly need to share data between your different platforms as I do, then your needs are more complicated than, say, if you could just do a one-time conversion to a Linux equivalent and then move on from there. And again, it depends on the specific applications involved. The short answer is that depending on your needs, and if you're willing to take a little time to learn a few different ways of doing things, Linux can be a very viable and cost effective way to extend the life of an older PC. Related:
Article 12038 | Posted November 29, 2007 |
Popular & Hot How do I make a new MSN Hotmail account? How do I delete history items from my Google tool bar? My desktop Recycle Bin has disappeared - why, and how do I get it back? How do I delete my Hotmail account? I accidentally deleted my Recycle Bin in Vista - how do I get it back? New & Important How can I get the old Windows Live Hotmail back? Internet Safety: How do I keep my computer safe on the internet? Are free email services worth it? Would you please recover my password? My account has been hacked or I've forgotten it.
Stay Informed Archives Advertisers |
|
•
I think Ubuntu would have a hard time in 384MB of ram. It would still work but it would not be as nimble. I would first try SAM Linux. It's a derivative of PCLinuxOS. I would download the Live CD and give it a whirl. It has most of the multimedia codecs and plugins baked in or at least readily available with the package manager. The next step down in hardware requirements is Puppy Linux and after that DSL (Damn Small Linux).
Sam Linux
DistroWatch Page:http://distrowatch.com/?newsid=04124
Live CD iso:http://ftp.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/linux/sam/SAM-2007.iso
Puppy Linux
DistroWatch Page: http://distrowatch.com/?newsid=04531
Live CD iso:ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/metalab/distributions/puppylinux/puppy-3.01-seamonkey.iso
Damn Small Linux
DistroWatch Page: http://distrowatch.com/?newsid=04552
Live CD iso:ftp://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/metalab/distributions/damnsmall/current/dsl-4.0.iso
I would be happy to have a laptop with any one of these distributions on it. Just remember that the world of Linux is very different than that of Microsoft Windows. Sometimes people trying Linux for the first time will make the mistake that if Ubuntu doesn't work for them, then Linux doesn't work for them. That's like saying if Chevy doesn't work for you, then neither does Honda, Ford, Toyota or any of the other makes and models of cars. We've been trained by Microsoft to believe that one size fits all, their size. It's not true with cars and it's not true with operating systems. Good luck.
Posted by: Richard Chapman at November 29, 2007 10:22 AMOne of the nice things about Ubuntu is you can run it from its own CD without actually installing it on the computer. And if you want a very lite Linux version, take a look at Puppy Linux.
Posted by: Mary at November 29, 2007 10:24 AMhttp://www.puppylinux.com/
I think that installing Windows 2000 is still a very good option for this laptop! I have several older machines running this version of Windows. Even on an old P1 233 Mhz. - 128 MB RAM it runs quite well!
Posted by: Bill at November 30, 2007 5:04 AMI second the suggestion of trying out Ubuntu with a "Live Cd" . If you do not like it or if it does not meet your needs then all you have to do is get rid of the CD. Other Linux distros also have "Live CD" so you can easily test any number of them.
Posted by: Dan Ullman at November 30, 2007 10:02 AMI see someone beat me to the suggestion to just go back to Windows 2000. Which I run with 512mb RAM on a P3 1000mHz computer, and I shamelessly overload it with live stock market data coming in and many programs running at the same time. Occasionally the overload boggles it down, but in general it does very well.
Which brings up a question for you Leo, why XP? Can you tell me what advantage a person would gain by switching from Win2000 to WinXP?
John
Posted by: John Clemens at November 30, 2007 7:28 PMI agree with Richard about trying the small linux distros. I have been looking for a couple of months at different linux distros. Those he mentioned would be a great place to start.
Posted by: Harold at December 1, 2007 7:57 AMWhen you're running from LiveCD, loading of programs will be quite slower than normal because it's loading from CD. After you load it once, it'll load from RAM. (In Ubuntu) You can add a system monitor on your panel and change the preference to show the memory. Then you can see how much RAM is used while you're doing your usual work. Note that "cached" doesn't really count as being "used". I personally would recommend Ubuntu. I've used it for 5 months and never gone back to Windows. Good luck.
Posted by: Lian at December 1, 2007 8:38 PMIf you are considering using Linux on an old computer, this article of mine might be useful.
Is Linux right for your mother?
Posted by: Michael Horowitz at December 3, 2007 10:12 PMhttp://blogs.cnet.com/8301-13554_1-9792477-33.html
I'm suprised Leo!?! There a number of emulator/virtual machines for Linux! I personally use Ubuntu 7.10 and tried Linux Mint, Mandrake, and kubuntu! On my current Ubuntu based computer I'm using Wine for Windows media Player and a few other apps! And Im using Innotek Virtual box to run XP inside Ubuntu! I use Compiz fusion which a desktop manager basically gives you 4 desktops in the form of a cube and on one side of the cube is XP (Would be vista but my 64-bit Vista isnt supported yet) and on the other 3 desktops I play with internet or whatever! I have a Matrix animated background for all the desktops play music surf the internet with Linux and inside the xp virtual machine I encode video or anything else while my system is faster than Windoze would
Posted by: Neowulf at December 4, 2007 1:56 PMbe as the host system! Did I mention this is all on my HP laptop lol! I have to say I havent been able to play Battlefield 2142 online in the xp box tho! Heres is an attempt at posting a screenshot!
http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j43/brianarydata/Screenshot-4.png