|
Summary: A vulnerability has been discovered in the DNS servers providing a critical part of internet infrastructure. It's easy to test and easy to work around.
DNS is one of those critical internet infrastructure things that we just don't think of all that often. But it is, indeed, critical. And when a vulnerability is discovered, it's a big deal. A very big deal. • In short, DNS is the service that your computer uses to turn names you and I can read and recognize, like "ask-leo.com", into IP addresses like 72.3.133.152 that are used by the internet to actually transfer data. It's good that you don't care about the exact details, because at this writing they haven't actually been divulged yet, and the various theories are fairly complex. "Even after a very large push ... that
vulnerability still exists on too many DNS servers."
The effect of the vulnerability is that if it is successfully exploited, a DNS request for a specific name can be forced to return the wrong IP address. So imagine that you're going to paypal.com and the DNS request that asks "what's the IP address for paypal.com?" returns an IP address of a hacker's server instead. A hacker's server that is crafted to look like Paypal, but is most definitely not Paypal. How would you know? That's why it's a big deal. Even after a very large push to get all the DNS servers patched before the vulnerability became public, the fact is that even today that vulnerability still exists on too many DNS servers. So, what can you do? The good news is that this is easy to detect, and easy to work around, even though it's not your problem. That's correct, it's not your problem. This is not something that's present on your computer. (Unless, that is, you're a geek running your own DNS server, like I am.) DNS servers are provided by your ISP, and it's there that the vulnerability may lie. Test your DNS. Visit this link: You'll note that's an IP address - if it were a normal name it would require a DNS look up using the very DNS server that you don't yet trust. (Thanks Michael Horowitz for that tidbit. And yes, in theory it could still be spoofed; more on that below.) You will be presented with two charts. The key is that you want both "Randomness" results to be "Great", and that each time you run the test the graphed dots and the list of "Values Seen" are different. That's all. If you get "Great" for both tests, you're done. (If you travel, or use a hotspot, you'll need to run this test at each location before you can feel safe.) If you didn't get "Great" for both, there are two things I believe you must do:
Now, I mentioned above that the test could be spoofed. Even when you go to the main page of the test by IP address rather than by name, the test itself still has to use DNS to perform the test. The danger scenario looks like this: your ISP has a vulnerable DNS server, that has been exploited. As part of the exploit the DNS names for the test servers are redirected to IP addresses of servers that always return "Great", no matter what. I honestly don't think this is very likely, but I include it for completeness. If there's any question at all, you'll be safe switching to OpenDNS. You'll likely hear more about this vulnerability in the coming weeks, but as long as things are "Great" you'll know you're safe. Related:
Article 12593 | Posted August 2, 2008 |
Popular & Hot How do I make a new MSN Hotmail account? How do I delete history items from my Google tool bar? My desktop Recycle Bin has disappeared - why, and how do I get it back? I accidentally deleted my Recycle Bin in Vista - how do I get it back? New & Important How can I get the old Windows Live Hotmail back? Internet Safety: How do I keep my computer safe on the internet? Are free email services worth it? Would you please recover my password? My account has been hacked or I've forgotten it.
Stay Informed Archives Advertisers |
|
•
Sorry, I supplied the wrong text on my last email, it should have read:
The page cannot be displayed
The page you are looking for is currently unavailable. The Web site might be experiencing technical difficulties, or you may need to adjust your browser settings. "
Not that it could not find the server. My apologies.
Eld.
Also, I did look at the OPEN DNS info and realized I have not heard why I might not want to stay with it if I choose to switch, and why I might want to switch, DNS issue or not. It looks pretty inviting, but how do they make their money?
Thanks,
Eld. (Orwell Lives!)
Posted by: Eldon Gaw (Orwell) at August 5, 2008 09:01 AMAm I to assume this DNS test will not work on a Mac?
-Leo
Posted by: Teresa Smith at August 5, 2008 09:01 AM
My ISP showed good at first test then on the 2nd try showed poor (just a straight line) on the first graph. Called them and they were unable to resovle the address on your e mail.
Posted by: Bob Ruttske at August 5, 2008 09:35 AMRan the test and received a result of Nominum. Is this company proven to be safe or is more time needed to tell? Better to use OpenDNS in the meantime or just sit tight? Thanks!
Posted by: S at August 5, 2008 09:47 AMFor Teresa: The DNS problem does affect Macs. The problem is an Internet networking thing, so it affects ALL computers on the Internet.
To those that asked about OpenDNS see
OpenDNS provides added safety for free
Posted by: Michael Horowitz at August 5, 2008 10:44 AMhttp://blogs.cnet.com/8301-13554_1-9834579-33.html
and
More about OpenDNS, including adult site filtering
http://blogs.cnet.com/8301-13554_1-9835649-33.html
I tried to use the test; however, all I got was "Failure to connect to Web Server". Didn't matter what time of day. Would this be a Hughesnet thing?
Posted by: Linda Claycomb at August 5, 2008 11:15 AMI tried using the test link and received the message, "The requested URL could not be retrieved
---
While trying to retrieve the URL: http://c5daea0164e51ed4f806e1d3.et.dns-oarc.net/
The following error was encountered:
Unable to determine IP address from host name for c5daea0164e51ed4f806e1d3.et.dns-oarc.net
The dnsserver returned:
No Address records
This means that:
The cache was not able to resolve the hostname presented in the URL.
Posted by: Bill Nelson at August 5, 2008 06:23 PMCheck if the address is correct.
Your cache administrator is support.
----
Generated Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:17:19 GMT by nocwebrun006.cisp.com (squid/2.5.STABLE11)"
From the preceding notes, I guess I'm not the only one having problems with the link, but the message seems different than others reported.
For the record, I ran the test and had no difficulties: it worked GREAT! ;-)
Posted by: Gin Fonte at August 6, 2008 11:54 AMI had no idea what a DNS server was. Now I know and mine are working "GREAT".
Posted by: Ryan at August 7, 2008 03:48 PMMy ISP's DNS server is Great, but now I'm wondering about where my website is hosted. Is this an issue? Is there a way to test it?
Posted by: Archi at August 9, 2008 02:11 AM