|
Summary: A zero day attack is very simple: it's exploitation of a vulnerability before there's a fix for that vulnerability. We'll look at what that means.
The very nature of "zero day" exploits is that your virus scanner would show that you were clean both before and after being infected. It's not until your anti-virus software provider updates their virus databases and you then take that update that your scanner would know what to look for. Yes, that means you may still be infected. Let's go through the timeline that got you here. • There are security vulnerabilities in Windows (and most all operating systems to varying degrees) that have not yet been discovered. If no one knows they're there then it's not an immediate threat, because hackers can't exploit things they don't know exist. Not infrequently one of "the good guys" will discover a vulnerability but keep it a secret so that malware authors don't find out about it and start to exploit it. Instead, the "good guy" contacts Microsoft and tells them about the issue so that a patch to Windows can be made available before the vulnerability becomes general knowledge. Quite often as a not-so-subtle form of encouragement to fix the problem the reporter will also indicate that he or she will make the vulnerability public within a certain amount of time. For example, Microsoft might be given 60 days to release a patch to remove the vulnerability. "If it's discovered "in the wild" before a fix is
available, Microsoft has zero days to fix the problem."
That's if one of the good guys finds it first. If a malware author discovers the problem and releases malware that exploits it then it's too late; systems can already start becoming infected. If it's discovered "in the wild" before a fix is available, then Microsoft has zero days to fix the problem. Hence, a "zero day" exploit, vulnerability, or attack. Let's look at that timeline a little more closely:
Step by step:
Like I said, it's a race. In the best of cases Microsoft has some time to release a patch to prevent a vulnerability from being exploited. Unfortunately it's all too common that they have zero days to do so. If you find yourself in the situation that you describe, here's a couple of suggestions:
† Naturally there are other things you can do to stay safe, just not related to this specific vulnerability or any malware that exploits it. Those things include the standard recommendations of not opening attachments from untrusted sources, being behind a firewall, not visiting untrustworthy web sites, and so on. Related: Article 11945 | Posted October 27, 2007 |
Popular & Hot How do I make a new MSN Hotmail account? How do I delete history items from my Google tool bar? My desktop Recycle Bin has disappeared - why, and how do I get it back? I accidentally deleted my Recycle Bin in Vista - how do I get it back? New & Important How can I get the old Windows Live Hotmail back? Internet Safety: How do I keep my computer safe on the internet? Are free email services worth it? Would you please recover my password? My account has been hacked or I've forgotten it.
Stay Informed Archives Advertisers |
|
•
One thing to consider - in Norton Internet Security 2008, Symantec introduced an improvement to it's Intrusion Prevention technology that protects against even obfuscated exploits targeted at IE and ActiveX components in IE. If you've got a current copy of NIS 07, then you can update to NIS 08 for free, FYI. The link is
http://www.symantec.com/home_homeoffice/support/special/upgrade2007/vista/migration_start.jsp?site=nuc
- I don't know why it says Vista in the link.
Posted by: EJPJ at October 29, 2007 10:02 AMYou must have NIS 2008 installed already for the above link to work.
Posted by: SWB at November 2, 2007 07:18 PMThe Drive-by Attack, probably a Zero-Day one (as my computer was fully updated and patched) that I experienced, attempted a download of malware which I successfully aborted before its completion by switching my computer off manually. In such a case would there be a possiblity of malware infection?
Posted by: Frank Braganza at November 3, 2007 08:38 AM-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
It seems unlikely that you'd be infected, but there's really no way to know
*for certain* that you're not. Did you turn it off in time? How would you know?
Leo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFHL8YOCMEe9B/8oqERAtI6AJ9+bx1aqZ+9ndWyBC2S/2CjLMOlhwCeJv/K
Posted by: Leo A. Notenboom at November 5, 2007 05:40 PMU9wiJESKNrv8cq3WGDtzEXQ=
=2Req
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----