|
Summary: There are many ways spammers harvest email addresses. While unlikely, simply sending and receiving email might well be enough.
In all honesty, this is a legitimate newsletter publisher's worst nightmare. You go through all the effort of playing by all the rules, not selling or sharing your subscribers' email addresses with anyone, anywhere, any time, and by making sure to use only industry leading and trusted service providers ... Only to find out a subscriber of yours is getting spam on an email address they use only to subscribe to your newsletter, and nowhere else. I know, because as you can see it's happened to me. • It's very common to sign up to newsletters or on-line stores with a unique email address that's used nowhere else, specifically to detect this case. For example, a user named Fred might create a new email address "fred-askleo@example.com" and use that only to subscribe to my newsletter, and taking extra care to make sure it never appears anywhere else - especially anywhere on the web. In theory, that means if he gets anything else on that email address it's because I or my service provider did something bad - like share the email address with someone else, accidentally or otherwise. In theory. And the theory is correct most of the time. "... spammers are always on the lookout for new ways to
identify and capture valid, working email addresses."
Unfortunately, "most of the time" isn't "100% of the time". If we examine the path(s) that email relating to, say, a newsletter subscription can take, we'll see that there are other opportunities for that email address to be captured by spammers.
In most of the points above I make it sound like spammers are looking for email addresses. They are. Spammers work one of two ways: they blast their spam to millions and millions of email addresses, not knowing whether or not they are valid. Most are not, but enough are to make it worth their while. The other approach is to blast only to known good email addresses. These are much more valuable because the spammer doesn't need to send nearly as much spam in order to reach "real people". As a result, spammers are always on the lookout for new ways to identify and capture valid, working email addresses. Now, I also need to say that the long list above looks pretty dire. It makes it seem like there's no way to even send an email without getting your email address snagged and starting to get spam on it. It's not nearly that bad. Possible, yes, but highly unlikely. As I write this I have 40,000 subscribers to my newsletter. I've sent out something like 144 issues over nearly three years. (I'll estimate that as having sent somewhere over 2,000,000 emails accounting for the growth over that time). I've had exactly two complaints of this form. Email addresses are much more commonly harvested by things like being published on web pages (do a Google search on your own, you may be surprised.) So the real point of all this is to show that there really are no absolutes. You, and I, and our ISPs and our service providers, we all do the best we can to keep things as secure and as private as is possible. But 100% security just doesn't exist. Related:
Article 12695 | Posted September 19, 2008 |
Popular & Hot How do I make a new MSN Hotmail account? How do I delete history items from my Google tool bar? My desktop Recycle Bin has disappeared - why, and how do I get it back? I accidentally deleted my Recycle Bin in Vista - how do I get it back? New & Important How can I get the old Windows Live Hotmail back? Internet Safety: How do I keep my computer safe on the internet? Are free email services worth it? Would you please recover my password? My account has been hacked or I've forgotten it.
Stay Informed Archives Advertisers |
|
•
Sadly, Anthony, you probably won't as the e-mail address is in some spammer's database somewhere. Sad, but true.
Posted by: Ziggie at September 22, 2008 6:21 AMLeo, you forgot to list dumb luck. Spammers send mail to likely but not known if working addresses. Even unlikely addresses. I once made a throw-away hotmail address that I never used. Random letters for the most part. It got one spam.
Posted by: Dan Ullman at September 22, 2008 9:33 AMYeah, like Dan mentioned, it's also likely that they could have just used random word generators to try and mail to every possible e-mail your provider could give out. One thing that's unfortunate about e-mails vice regular mail (at least in a spammer perspective) is that there is effectiely no cost from the spammer's view to send an e-mail, even if they send it to a hundred, a thousand, or even a million addresses at once. The cost only gets applied on the recipients' mail servers, who need to handle the flood of spam coming for their members.
Posted by: RJ at September 22, 2008 9:49 AMThanks for that Leo. I'm going to conduct a wee experiment. What I'll do is create another new disposable email address and sign up to your newsletter again with it, and see whether the spammers find it again. If they do I'll let you know.
It's only that one firm of spammers, btw, that I mentioned in my previous comment on the subject.
Posted by: Nick at September 23, 2008 9:16 AMThe experiment continues. I've re-subscribed using (as Leo can see) a new but similar disposable email address. I shall check in my Trash folder over the next few days to see whether any spam arrives addressed to the new address.
Incidentally, I'm also glad to have re-subscribed for another reason, as it means I get a copy of Leo's e-book on Internet Safety, which I am looking forward to perusing.
Posted by: Nick at September 23, 2008 11:46 AMLeo,
All good explanations. I also like the "dumb luck" and "random" explanation, though hardly dumb luck or random. When I was on Earthlink, about once a week I'd be cc'd on an e-mail with a nonsensical message in the body. The sender wasn't even shy about hiding the cc list:
aaaaaa@earthlink.com; aaaaab@earthlink.com; aaaaac@earthlink.com; aaaaad@earthlink.com; ...
or some similar progressive block of 20 to 30 addresses that happened to contain mine. Earthlink could have easily blocked such "fishing" expeditions (at the time they were running an expensive TV ad complain touting their anti-spam team) but refused to do so even after repeated complaints.
Don't get me started on free WiFi increasingly common in hotels and airports. They routinely harvest information such as e-mail addresses, legally if you agree to their TOS.
Leo, what is AWeber and what user information do you share with them?
23-Sep-2008
And spam can already be directed to the address.
Posted by: Fred at September 23, 2008 11:22 PMAs in: someone already had it, did something stupid, got plenty spam, closed the account, then you get the account, and the spam is still coming......
I have 4 email accounts. My main one is at Yahoo, for my web site. I have an Hotmail one because my relatives started using MSN Messenger. I have a Gmail account - reason still unknown - it seemed like a good idea at the time. I also have my email from my ISP.
I have never given or used the Gmail account but when I log in the Spam folder has currently 1283 emails. Amazingly, the spam in the other accounts have dropped considerabily.
I use to average between 150 to 200 emails daily. That has dropped to about 30 - I take no credit for it :-).
http://www.geocities.com/terryhollett2003/
Posted by: Terry Hollett at September 24, 2008 5:39 AMThanks Leo! I was just wondering.
I have gotten spam through my GMail account. I'd used Google Checkout and it turned out the merchant's computer was infected. Google doesn't scan checkout related mail for spam. Fortunately, you can elect not to receive e-mail from checkout merchants, which solve that problem.
As I explained elsewhere, through my own domain I've created a primary e-mail account whose address I give to friends and relatives. For everyone else I create a individual custom domain forward to my primary account. If I ever start getting spam through a forward, I'll just delete it and create a new one for the merchant or organization.
Since setting up about four months ago, the amount of spam I receive has went from over a hundred a day to zero. Of course this method can't be used by e-mail accounts that must accept messages from arbitrary senders.
Posted by: Ray at September 24, 2008 12:59 PMOn Sept 23rd I wrote "I'm going to conduct a wee experiment. What I'll do is create another new disposable email address and sign up to your newsletter again with it, and see whether the spammers find it again. If they do I'll let you know." Well, it seems to have worked, as I am no longer receiving the spam.
Posted by: Nick at October 14, 2008 9:39 AM