Helping people with computers... one answer at a time.
Quite often, version numbers seem to be random choices of the programmers. There might be a better way.
What's up with labeling seemingly every other update of Firefox a new version? It was years to get to version 3, then in the bat of an eye, we're up to version 11 with little noticeable difference. Any idea what the Mozilla folks are thinking? Seems to cheapen the "V" in version.
In this excerpt from Answercast #12, I look at the new way Firefox is labeling their versions and point out a versioning system that I like.
They actually made an announcement about this about a year ago that they were changing their version numbering of releases of Firefox.
They have their reasons; it's really not important enough to understand why... I don't think.
My take on it, in general, is that version numbers are fairly meaningless - other than in comparison to previous version numbers of the same product. So the fact that version 4 came after version 3 is pretty much all you need to know. The fact that version 11 came after version 10 is probably all you need to know.
The nuances of what changed (why it changed; was this a big update; was this a little update) is so inconsistently applied across the industry that it's lost all meaning. In a lot of ways, it's flown the way of the term "beta," which has been abused so much so as to be meaningless in many cases.
So the short answer is, "Yeah, they did; they changed the way they are incrementing their version numbers." They have some consistent rationale internally. For most of us, for the average users, it doesn't really matter.
All you really care about is to know:
I will comment, as an aside here, that the version numbering that I appreciate the most is the one being used by Ubuntu Linux. Their version numbering scheme is not a true numbering scheme. It's more of a date stamp scheme.
For example, Ubuntu 10.04 was released in the fourth month of 2010, so you know exactly how old that version is.
We're coming up, as I'm recording this, in the fourth month of 2012. So I expect 12.04 of Ubuntu sometime this month.
I like that; it gives you a little bit more information about what the product it is; how old it is, just by looking at the version number.
Yes, they have additional numbers that follow that, that typically increment. I like having major version numbers actually have some meaning beyond simply being an incrementing number.
Once it's just an incrementing number, however, the specifics are meaningless; other than to compare it to other versions of the same program.
Next - Where is "Run" in Windows 7?
Comments on this entry are closed.
If you have a question, start by using the search box up at the top of the page - there's a very good chance that your question has already been answered on Ask Leo!.
If you don't find your answer, head out to http://askleo.com/ask to ask your question.