Ask Leo! by Leo A. Notenboom

Why is attaching a Word document to email such a bad idea?

Search First! Then browse: Categories | Full Archive | By Date | Newsletter

Home » EMail

At my organization we regularly email Microsoft Word documents to one another as attachments. Meeting minutes, agendas, summaries, pretty much anything other than really short messages get written in Word, and then sent as an attachment.

I recently had someone from outside the organization claim that this was a really bad idea. He was quite adamant that we should be doing that as little as possible. He claimed that there were so many reasons he couldn't list them all.

Can you?

Yes. Yes I can. It's something I feel fairly strongly about. So strongly, that I'm often that "someone from outside the organization".

Don't get me wrong, Microsoft Word has it's place. But 9 times out of 10 that place is not as an attachment to email.

Let me first be clear: I know that a lot of folks use Word as their email editor in Microsoft Outlook. It's a simple setting, and while I also believe it's the wrong thing to do for many of the same reasons listed below, that's actually not what I'm talking about here. The scenario that causes the worst problems looks like this: you write a message in Word, you save that message to disk, and you then attach that resulting Word ".doc" document to an email which you then send to someone.

Word is a wonderful word-processing program. I use it myself, probably daily. It's feature rich (perhaps too much so), incredibly powerful, and absolutely the right tool for creating good looking printed documents.

Unfortunately it's too easy to come to rely on Word for everything. Even things that it's not well suited for. Like email.

Here's why Word attachments are bad:

  • Your recipient may not have Word, or a program that can read Word documents. I often read email on my cell phone, and Word documents are promptly ignored. With handheld devices such as Treo's or Blackberry's becoming more and more connected, this is an increasingly frequent occurrence.

  • Your recipient may not be able to open the attachment. Due to the proliferation of viruses in Word documents, many mail programs don't allow Word documents to be opened directly, or in some cases, even saved to disk. Yes, there are ways around it, but many recipients don't know how, or are uninterested in taking the time to figure out how. Besides, why put up an additional barrier when you don't need to?

  • Your recipient may never get the message. Email with attachments, particularly Word documents, are more likely to be filtered as spam or as a potential virus, even if they are neither. Avoiding attachments helps stack some of the odds in your favor.

  • The message will be significantly larger than it needs to be. Word documents are big. Often much bigger than the message they contain. The previous paragraph, a little over 40 words or around 250 characters resulted in a Word document over 20,000 bytes in size. Why do we care about size? Ever had your hard disk run out of room? By sending around oversized documents you're forcing that on your recipients as well. And, larger emails take longer to deliver, slow down networks and generally waste communications resources on the internet.

  • The message will be significantly slower to open. You don't know what kind of machine your recipient has. Word is a big program. Requiring that your recipient open and run this large application in order to view your message is just another barrier to getting your message read.

  • You run the risk of unintentional leaks of information. When "Fast Save" is enabled in Word, deleted information is not necessarily deleted from the document, it's merely marked as "don't show this". Using very simple tools that previously deleted information possibly including old comments, notes and prior revisions, is easily accessible to anyone.

  • Word's formatting abilities, while also making the document even bigger, are often used in ways that detract from the message. Keep your message simple, and you'll stand a much better of getting your message across.

So what's the right thing to do?

9 times out of 10 the right thing to do is to simply put your message into the email body directly. Don't involve Word at all. Don't get fancy, don't go nuts with formatting or tables or pictures ... just say what needs saying and be done.

A smaller , faster message is much more likely to be delivered and read than a bloated, slow attachment in Word. It's that simple. And I'm not even talking about making your message smaller, say using fewer words (though that's good too). I'm simply talking about the tools used to contain your message.

When is Word called for?

In my opinion, Word is only called for when you are actually working on a document. When you are, perhaps, collaborating on a document, or passing a document around to be read or reviewed. If you've written a report that will at some point be printed or published in some form, a Word document might be appropriate. If your message requires a very formal presentation (most do not), or it requires features or functionality found in Word (most do not), then Word might be called for.

But if your message is only going to live or be viewed primarily in email - then there's simply no reason to drag an application such as Word into the mixture.

In fact, there's every reason to avoid it.

I will throw out one last caveat: in some organizations, culture may dictate what you need to do. If that culture is "send everything in Word", I naturally encourage you to work to change that culture if you can. Some organizations give you no choice. Certain types of communication require certain forms. In these cases, you're pretty much out of luck.

The good news is that while everything I've said still applies, problems are slightly less when the email stays within an organization. However once you send outside of your organization and across the internet, then these issues are of particular importance.

Related:

Article C2586 - March 8, 2006

Helpful? Get new articles weekly by email in my FREE newsletter!

Your Name:
Your Email:


Why Subscribe?

Recent Comments
17 Comments

I write a weekly column for a newspaper and for the past several years, at the editor's request, have written the column on Word, hit Edit, then Select All, then Copy. I open Email, oped Edit then Paste to attach my column to the Email. The process has worked until yesterday when my attachment notation comes up in grey (not blue) on the Email and I am told after sending that the attachment has been aborted. I've been struggling through several processes to try to determine what has happened - all to no avail - and am at wit's end. I am by no means a truly computer-savvy person. Can anyone suggest a path for me to follow in order to get this matter back to normal? All suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Alice

Not without knowing what email program you're using and pasting into.
- Leo
07-Dec-2008

Posted by: Alice Benham at December 6, 2008 1:52 PM

I'm so annoyed by people who do the following, when they need to send support requests:

Instead of simple attaching the image, they first embed the image into a word doc, making me having to first open the dic, then sav it as html, then finally open the image. Word is a very bad image viewer, and this ridiculous practice makes no sense.

People: THINK! You don't need Word to hold your hand to attach an image to an email. Please, just attach the image.

I'd say that about 1/3 of all screenshots I receive are embedded in a Word doc. What a waste of bandwidth and my time!

Thanks,
Hayduke

Posted by: IT Supporter at December 8, 2008 6:38 AM

Soon we will be using online documents, ala Google Docs and won't have to send any documents to co workers..

There are a lot of reasons that will not be universal ... at least not for a long time. (Privacy, corporate policies, the assumption of internet connectivity, among others.) But I agree it is often a better approach than sending docs around as attachments.
- Leo
04-Mar-2009

Posted by: Gary at March 3, 2009 9:09 AM

I have a relative who received a .doc attachement, a shedule for his daughter from school. He had just gotten a Vista system and couldn't open it at first, you have to save it on your hard drive first.

Then when he did open it it was just a jumbled mess. I assumed it was in a format not compatible with his basic word program. I found the link to the Microsoft Word Viewer, he had to download a 25MB file on a dial-up connection.

He downloaded it and was able to read the attachement.

[link removed]

Posted by: Terry Hollett at March 4, 2009 5:35 AM

I have a problem with folks who e-mail bids or quotes using Word documents or Excel spreadsheets. How easy would it be for me or someone else to make a significant change in their price, print it out, then attempt to hold them to it? Print anything you don't want modified as a PDF, and/or lock down the file if possible to prevent just such a scenario.

So I'll just modify your PDF instead - even the locked one. It's been a long standing concern of mine that digital documents are easily manipulated by those with enough know-how. There are approaches, like digital signing, that can prove or disprove authenticity, but they're not at all commonplace.
- Leo
05-Mar-2009

Posted by: Phil Corbin at March 4, 2009 8:14 AM

not only is adding word .doc attachments a generally bad idea, also any other "attachment" that could be simply put in the body of the email text is a bad idea,
a word .doc can be anywhere from 3 - 10 times the size of the actual text it contains, some people still have inbox & storage limits especially those imposed by corporate IT Dept. if you're close to that limit and an email with a huge .doc attachment comes in it might not be delivered or some of your previous emails might be purged before you want them purged,

my general rule is only send attachments at the request of the recipient.

Posted by: Richard FDisk at March 4, 2009 4:27 PM

If the document is saved as .rtf, it will open in Wordpad and should not carry macros with it.

Kerry

Posted by: Kerry Lund at March 8, 2009 2:53 PM

Slightly off-topic but speaking of Word, I've used your approach to slimming down my system, which I by and large love, but this article does remind me to raise one question I have: one of the methods you recommend to slim down your system is to delete all documents with the .doc extension -- these are Word documents. If I deleted all of my Word docs, my entire life would be destroyed, as a writer, a teacher, and sometimes a student. Is there ever a situation where one would want to delete all Word docs to slim down a system?

I've never recommended deleting all of your .doc files. Where did that come from?
- Leo
11-Mar-2009

Posted by: Jim at March 10, 2009 9:58 AM

This is very helpful. I love WordPerfect and have struggled working back and forth. I was glad to see that .rtf is such a good accomodation. One of my computers has both Word and WordPerfect, the other, shareware (ThinkWrite, et. al.). Many times I use Notepad, less often, WordPad.

I edit many resumes and may need to purchase the PDF conversion software.

I will continue checking your site for more ideas, advice and info exchange. Thank you.

Posted by: Tim Rice at March 11, 2009 1:37 AM

Any convincing arguments against using .rtf format? I noticed other people suggested it and it is used in usenet and bbs for documents as well.

Posted by: Ravi Menon at June 30, 2009 2:36 AM

Post a comment on "Why is attaching a Word document to email such a bad idea?":






(Email Address will not be published.)

Remember Me?

By popular demand...
my tip jar
Cuppa Joe
Buy Leo a Latte!

(you may use HTML tags for style)

RSS feed Subscribe to the RSS Feed specifically for comments on this article.

Before commenting, please...

Please wait. Your comment is being processed ...


Question? Ask Leo!