Ask Leo! by Leo A. Notenboom

Why shouldn't I use the "Report Spam" or "Junk" button?

Search First! Then browse: Categories | Full Archive | By Date | Newsletter

Home » EMail

Summary: The "Report Spam" and "Junk" link serve an important function in the war against spam. However, used improperly they can do much more harm than good.

As I was dealing with my email the other day, a friend was with me. He nearly when ballistic when I used the "Report Spam" button to get rid of some email in my in box. He said I was using it wrong. There's a right and wrong way? Why shouldn't I just use it?

Oh, my, yes - there is most definitely a wrong way to use it. In fact it's so wrong, that you could be contributing to other people not being able to get their email.

Their legitimate, non-spam, email.

The concept behind buttons like "Junk", in Hotmail, or "Spam", in Yahoo Mail, "Report Spam" in Google's GMail, and similar buttons in different mailers is simple: let users decide what is, and is not spam, and use that information to build a better spam filter. Spam is notoriously difficult to identify, but the theory goes that "you know it when you see it". As more and more people tell the mail services "this is spam", these services can then use various characteristics of that mail to make their spam filters better.

The flaw in this scenario is, unfortunately, the users. As it turns out they often do not know spam when they see it, and report legitimate mail as spam. If enough people do that, then eventually legitimate mail starts getting blocked by spam filters. You, and others, cannot get the mail you asked for, because you, or others, reported it as spam.

Let's use an example. Let's say I'm a newsletter publisher (which, coincidentally, I am). In order to get my news letter you have to a) provide your email address, and then b) reply to an email sent to that address to confirm that you really, truly meant to sign up, and you want my newsletter. That's referred to as "double-opt-in", and is the industry standard way of making sure you really mean it when you sign up for an email newsletter.

So far so good.

Now, you receive my newsletter. Maybe you don't like it. Maybe it's not what you expected. Either way, you explicitly asked to receive it, and confirmed that you wanted it. By definition, it is not spam - spam is email you didn't ask for.

"'Report as Spam' is not a substitute for 'Unsubscribe'"

If you want to stop receiving this email, then the thing to do, of course, is hit the unsubscribe link. Since you asked for this email, and confirmed that you wanted it, the right thing to do is to follow the directions to unsubscribe from it.

If you use the "Report as Spam" button, you are harming both the publisher of that newsletter, and the other subscribers to that newsletter. How? Because you've told the mailer that it's spam, when it is not. The mailer may eventually start blocking that newsletter, not only from you, but from other recipients using the same service.

Think that's far-fetched? Think again. I know of several newsletters that are having delivery issues with some of the larger mail systems because a few people hit "Report as Spam" instead of unsubscribing as they should have. I know of at least one who's stopped supporting recipients of one mail service, and I know of another that's stopped accepting subscribers from Hotmail and Yahoo completely because of these types of deliverability issues.

"Report as Spam" is not a substitute for "Unsubscribe". If you asked for the mail, then use the proper steps to unsubscribe. If you know you did not, if you know that what you're looking at is truly spam - unsolicited email - then by all means, report it as spam.

But on behalf of all the legitimate newsletter publishers out there, and their subscribers, please know the difference, and act accordingly.

Article C2497 - December 20, 2005

Was this article helpful? «Yes» «No»

Helpful? Get new articles weekly by email in my FREE newsletter!

Your Name:
Your Email:


Why Subscribe?

Recent Comments
38 Comments

This is a reply to what Claude said in December. Yes, yahoo has a 'block Address' function but the only block 100 addresses. Unfortunately, you start receiving it again after that and have to erase the list and start a new one. The spammers change their IP addresses/domain/websites, whatever, so often that by the time the list is full they are not using those old addresses anyway.

I have tried to get some of my friends to be responsible and not just hit the spam button if they do not like what they are getting.

Posted by: Charlotte Hyatt at January 27, 2009 8:35 PM

My ISP is Orange. To avoid any problems with infected e mails or junk, i log into the orange website and open my e mails from there. I can tick all to clear all e mails or untick the one's i want, which, when i open outlook only brings in the e mails i unticked..brilliant....

Posted by: david cowling at February 4, 2009 11:21 AM

Here's another twist to the reporting of spam: I receive MANY a spam email where the sender has spoofed my own email address as the sender. When it arrives in my inbox, it looks as if it's coming from either my specific address or the info@ address on my website. The difference? They usually have no time/date stamp.

My hosting provider tells me that if I mark those as spam, it will mark ME as a spammer -- not what I want for sure. So, I just have to exercise that good 'ole delete button.

I also use a program called MailWasherPro from FireTrust -- it gives you a preview of mail on your server before you download it into your Outlook or other email program. You can use MailWasherPro to mark as spam, delete and/or bounce (send a message that this was sent to an invalid address) each message in your queue before they hit your actual inbox. It wasn't free, but not expensive either. And it saves me a lot of time in cutting the crap before it takes up bandwidth/time to download on my machine.

Posted by: Kara at February 4, 2009 1:52 PM

Leo - Your comments assume that by submitting emails as spam, a new filter is being created for many different users. Perhaps this is the documented way that these services work. However, what if by submitting emails as spam, a filter is being created that is customized to me and only me. In other words, my improper categorization of a newsletter about turkeys as spam will result in a filter that weeds out content that is sent to me and relates to turkeys , but your filter continues to send you content relating to turkeys.

I can tell you as a newsletter publisher myself, and having managed many mailing lists, more often than not "Report As Spam" is used at the global level. If you report something as spam, then that may very well affect someone else's ability to get that same email.
- Leo
09-Apr-2009

Posted by: JR at April 8, 2009 10:37 AM

I read every word you said. is hotmail.com just behind the times or am I missing sdomething? I get junk mail over and over and can't block the idiots. thank you for your time.

Posted by: Viki Valentine at July 1, 2009 7:53 PM

Post a comment on "Why shouldn't I use the "Report Spam" or "Junk" button?":



(Name will be included when your comment is published.)



(Email Address will not be published.)

Remember Me?

By popular demand...
my tip jar
Cuppa Joe
Buy Leo a Latte!

(you may use HTML tags for style)

RSS feed Subscribe to the RSS Feed specifically for comments on this article.

Before commenting, please...

  • Read the article at the top of this page. If your comment shows you didn't, it'll be deleted and ignored.

  • Comment only on this article. Use the Google search box at the top of the page if you have a question about something else.

  • Don't include personal information in the comment. No email addresses. No phone numbers. No physical addresses.

  • Don't spam. Excessive links to unrelated sites within a comment or across multiple comments will cause all such comments to be removed.

  • Don't ask me to recover lost passwords or hacked accounts. I can't, and those comments will be deleted.

  • I can't respond to every comment. And I can't vouch for the accuracy of others who do.

Please wait. Your comment is being processed ...




Question? Ask Leo!